Различие между активной и пассивной эвтаназией считается важнейшей проблемой медицинской этики. Сама идея состоит в том, что допустимо, по крайней мере в некоторых случаях, прекратить лечение и дать больному умереть, но никогда не разрешается предпринимать какие-либо прямые действия, предназначенные для умерщвления пациента. Эту доктрину разделяет, по-видимому, большинство врачей, что отражено в заявлении, принятом собранием делегатов Американской медицинской ассоциации 4 декабря 1973 года: «Намеренное прекращение жизни одного человеческого существа другим — милосердное убийство — противоречит и самому предназначению медицинской профессии, и политике Американкой медицинской ассоциации. Вопрос о прекращении применения особых мер для продления жизни тела, когда точно установлено, что биологическая смерть неминуема, предоставляется решать пациенту и (или) его близким. Совет и мнение врача должны быть свободно предоставлены пациенту и (или) его близким».
Результаты (
английский) 1:
[копия]Скопировано!
The distinction between active and passive euthanasia is considered to be the most important problem of medical ethics. The idea is that acceptable, at least in some cases, stop treatment and allow a patient to die, but never allowed to take any direct action designed to kill the patient. This doctrine separates, apparently, most doctors, as reflected in the Declaration adopted by the Assembly of delegates of the American Medical Association December 4, 1973 year: "the intentional termination of the life of one human being by another-compassionate killing is contrary to the purpose of the medical profession, and the policy of the American Medical Association. The question of the cessation of the application of specific measures to extend the life of the body, when it has been established that biological death is inevitable, is available to address patient and (or) his relatives. The Council and the opinion of the doctor should be freely given to the patient and (or) its close. "
переводится, пожалуйста, подождите..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b964a/b964a31ad265972ddbf70955c8c4732ff4de7525" alt=""
Результаты (
английский) 2:
[копия]Скопировано!
The difference between active and passive euthanasia is considered to be the most important problem of medical ethics. The idea is that it is permissible, at least in some cases, stop treatment and allow the patient to die, but never allowed to take any direct action designed to kill the patient. This doctrine divides, apparently, the majority of doctors, which is reflected in the statement adopted by the Assembly of Delegates of the American Medical Association, December 4, 1973: "The intentional termination of the life of one human being by another - compassionate murder - contradicts the very purpose of the medical profession, and politics American Medical Association. The issue of terminating the application of specific measures to prolong the life of the body when it is well established that biological death is imminent, provided the patient to decide and (or) his relatives. The Council and the doctor's opinion must be freely given to the patient and (or) his relatives. "
переводится, пожалуйста, подождите..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b964a/b964a31ad265972ddbf70955c8c4732ff4de7525" alt=""
Результаты (
английский) 3:
[копия]Скопировано!
the distinction between active and passive euthanasia is considered to be the most important problem of medical ethics. the idea is that it is, at least in some cases, stop treatment and let the patient die.but never be allowed to take any direct action intended for killing the patient. this doctrine shared by, apparently, most of the doctors, as reflected in the statementthe assembly of delegates of the american medical association on december 4, 1973.the intentional termination of life of one human being the other's gracious murder contrary to the purpose and to the medical profession, and the politics of american medical association.the issue of ending the use of the special measures for prolonging the life of the body when it has been clearly established that biological death is imminent, is available to the patient and / or his relatives.the council and the doctor's opinion should be freely provided by the patient and / or his близким».
переводится, пожалуйста, подождите..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b964a/b964a31ad265972ddbf70955c8c4732ff4de7525" alt=""