NATO formally welcomed Russia as a

NATO formally welcomed Russia as a participant - but not as a fullfledged
member. The agreement signed at an extraordinary meeting of the
leaders of NATO's member nations, marked another major step in its effort
to lock in Moscow's shift toward the West. The accord will for the first time
give Moscow a role from the outset in NATO discussions about a fixed variety
of topics, including non-proliferation, crisis management, missile defence
and counterterrorism. But in an indication that the North Atlantic
Treaty Organisation's members are still not fully convinced that Russia has
completely renounced aggression and cast its lot with Europe, Moscow will
not be a member of the alliance or be bound by its collective defence pact, in
which all members pledge to come to each other's defence if necessary. Nor
will Russia have a veto over NATO decisions or a vote in the expansion of
its membership, including NATO's plans to invite in new nations - almost
all of them once part of the Soviet bloc. The new council does not replace
the North Atlantic Council, the body where NATO usually makes its decisions.
The significance of this meeting is difficult to overestimate. The idea of
Russia sitting at NATO councils would have been, simply, unthinkable. Two
former foes are now joined as partners, overcoming decades of division and
uncertainty. Co-operation with the world's second largest nuclear power is
more likely to be achieved by welcoming Russia west. Some NATO officials
have voiced concern that the new council is not substantive enough for Russia.
Meeting with reporters this afternoon, US Secretary of State said that while
Russia and the United States were reducing their nuclear arsenals drastically,
and co-operating in NATO, each country was maintaining a hedge. "We'll
always have a hedge against uncertainty in the future, in our military forces in
the nuclear weapons that the United States will continue to retain," he said.
"It's a hedge against the future, because there are other nations that possess
nuclear weapons or might come to possess nuclear weapons."

Результаты (английский) 1:

NATO formally welcomed Russia as a participant-but not as a fullfledgedMember. The agreement signed at an extraordinary meeting of theleaders of the member nations NATO's, marked another major step in its effortto lock in Moscow's shift toward the West. The accord will for the first timegive Moscow a role from the outset in NATO discussions about a fixed varietyof topics, including non-proliferation, crisis management, missile defenceand counterterrorism. But in an indication that the North AtlanticTreaty Organisation's members are still not fully convinced that Russia hascompletely renounced aggression and cast its lot with Europe, Moscow willnot be a member of the alliance or be bound by its collective defence pact, inwhich all members pledge to come to each other's defence if necessary. Norwill Russia have a veto over NATO decisions or a vote in the expansion ofits membership, including NATO's plans to invite in new nations-almostall of them once part of the Soviet bloc. The new council does not replacethe North Atlantic Council, the body where NATO usually makes its decisions.The significance of this meeting is difficult to overestimate. The idea ofRussia sitting at NATO councils would have been, simply, unthinkable. Twoformer foes are now joined as partners, overcoming decades of division anduncertainty. Co-operation with the world's second largest nuclear power ismore likely to be achieved by welcoming Russia west. Some NATO officialshave voiced concern that the new council is not substantive enough for Russia.Meeting with reporters this afternoon, US Secretary of State said that whileRussia and the United States were reducing their nuclear arsenals drastically,and co-operating in NATO, each country was maintaining a hedge. "We'llalways have a hedge against uncertainty in the future, in our military forces inthe nuclear weapons that the United States will continue to retain, "he said."It's a hedge against the future, because there are other nations that possessnuclear weapons or might come to possess nuclear weapons. "

Результаты (английский) 2:

Formally Russia are welcomed the NATO as with a Participant - But not as with a fullfledged
member. AT a signed Agreement of The an extraordinary meeting of the
Leaders of the NATO's member Nations, a marked-another major step in its'-effort
to the lock in the shift Moscow's Toward the West. For will of accord of The the first time
give Moscow a role from the outset in the NATO the Discussions about the fixed a Variety
of topics, Including the non-Proliferation, crisis management, missile Defence
and counterterrorism. But in an indication That the of North The Atlantic
Treaty Organisation's members are to still not fully Convinced That Russia has
a completely renounced aggression and cast its 'lot with Europe, Moscow will of
not the BE a member of the alliance or the BE bound by its' collective Defence PACT, in
the which all members pledge to come to each other's defence if necessary. The Nor
will of Russia have a veto over the NATO Decisions 'or a vote in the expansion of
its' membership Member, Including Plans to the NATO's new in the INVITE Nations - by Almost
all of Them once recording part of the Soviet bloc. New council does of The not the replace
the of North The Atlantic Council, the body where clause Usually the NATO Makes its 'Decisions'.
Of The Significance of the this meeting is Difficult to overestimate. Of: idea of The
Russia sitting AT the NATO Councils Would have Been, Simply, the unthinkable. Of Two
the former's foes are joined now! Just as with partners, Overcoming Decades of division and
Uncertainty. Operation with-Co is the world's: second-largest nuclear on power is
more likely to to the BE Achieved by welcoming Russia west. Some the NATO Officials
have voiced sinking concern That the new council is not substantive enough for Russia.
Meeting with Reporters the this afternoon, US Secretary of State Said That 'while'
Russia and the United States Were Reducing Their nuclear on Arsenals drastically,
and a co-the operating in the NATO, each country was maintaining a hedge. "For We'll
the always have a hedge Against Uncertainty in the future, in Our military Forces in
the nuclear on weapons That the United States will of 'continue' to a retain," he Said.
"It's a hedge Against the future, Because there are OTHER Nations That Possess
nuclear weapons or might come to possess nuclear weapons. "

Результаты (английский) 3:

nato formally in england as a participant, but not as a fullfledgedmember. the agreement signed at an extraordinary meeting of theleaders of nato"s member nations, marked another major step in its effortto lock in moscow"s shift toward the west. the accord will for the first timegive us a role from the outset in nato discussions about a fixed varietyof topics, including non-proliferation, crisis management, missile defenceand counterterrorism. but in an indication that the north atlantictreaty organization"s members are still not fully convinced that russia hasa renounced aggression and cast its lot with europe, moscow willnot be a member of the alliance or be bound by its collective defence pact, inall members and protect brain to come to each other"s defence if necessary. imagewill it have a veto over nato decisions or a vote in the expansion ofits membership in nato"s plans to invite in new england - almostall of them once part of the soviet bloc. the new council does not replacethe north atlantic council, the body where nato usually makes its decisions.the significance of this meeting is difficult to overestimate. the idea ofengland sitting at nato councils would have been, simply, unthinkable. twoformer foes are now joined as partners, overcoming decades of division anduncertainty. co operation with the world"s second largest nuclear power ismore likely to be achieved by new england west. some nato officialshave voiced concern that the new council is not substantive enough for russia.meeting with reporters this afternoon, us secretary of state said that whilerussia and the united states were reducing their nuclear arsenals worked,and co - operating in nato, each country was maintaining a hedge. " we "llalways have a hedge against uncertainty in the future, in our military forces inthe nuclear weapons that the united states will continue to retain, "he said."it"s a hedge against the future, because there are other nations that possessnuclear weapons or might come to possess nuclear weapons. "