Что касается президента, то нужно п

Что касается президента, то нужно понимать, что он ведь отвечает не за то, чтобы понравиться избирателям. Он отвечает за результат. Он может быть популистом в избирательных кампаниях, но у него гораздо меньше права быть популистом в экономической политике. Усиление президентской власти почти всегда означает попадание президента в зависимость. Без сильной президентской власти продвижение вперед было бы более трудным, а может быть и вовсе невозможным. Но резко ограничивая роль парламента в управлении страной, объективно подталкиваем парламент к популизму - он ведь ни за что не отвечает. Он просто делает гадости правительству. Что особенно ясно было видно этим летом, когда парламент, пренебрегая объективной экономической необходимостью, оттаптывался на правительстве Кириенко и толкал нас к августовскому краху.

Результаты (английский) 1:

As for the President, then we need to understand that it is not to please the voters. He is responsible for the result. It may be populist in election campaigns, but it is much less right to be populist economic policies. Strengthening presidential power almost always means hit the President hostage. Without strong presidential power forward would be more difficult, and perhaps even impossible. But sharply restricting the Parliament's role in the governance of the country, forcing Parliament to populism objectively-he never meets the. It just does nasty things to the Government. That is especially clear to be seen this summer, when Parliament, ignoring the objective economic necessity, the Government ottaptyvalsja kiriyenko and pushed us to the August crash.

Результаты (английский) 2:

As for the president, it is necessary to understand that he's not responsible for what, to please voters. He is responsible for the result. It can be a populist election campaigns, but it is much smaller than the right to be a populist economic policy. Strengthening of presidential power almost always means getting the president to depend. headway without strong presidential power would be more difficult and perhaps even impossible. But sharply limiting the role of the parliament in the governance of the country, objectively are pushing parliament to populism - he's no is responsible for anything. It just makes shit government. What most clearly to be seen this summer, when the parliament, disregarding the objective economic necessity, ked Kiriyenko government and pushed us to the August crash.

Результаты (английский) 3:

with regard to the president, you have to understand that he is not to please the voters. he is responsible for the result. he may be populist electoral campaigns, but it is much less than the right to be populist economic policies. the presidential power almost always means hit the president in addiction. without a strong presidential power forward, it would be more difficult, perhaps even impossible. but sharply limiting the role of parliament in the government of the country, objectively push parliament populism - he's not answering. he just makes a bad government. what particularly clearly show this summer, when parliament, ignoring the objective economic necessity, оттаптывался government kiriyenko and pushed us to августовскому collapse.