Результаты (
английский) 1:
[копия]Скопировано!
One of the aims of any government is to provide justice. "Justice" is a difficult concept, because everyone has a different idea of it. A broad idea of justice is the fair and moral treatment of people. There is a strong belief that there are "rules of justice"-the rules that build on moral principles. These rules dictate that if we behave morally, there will be a reward, and if we are bad, there will be punishment. These principles, known as morality, are quite subjective. They depend on many factors, such as traditions, culture, education, religion, etc. Nevertheless, we all agree on the basic moral values. Most people willingly accept the Ten Commandments from the Bible. The Bible teachers honour our parents to us, not to murder, not to be unfaithful to our spouses, not to steal, not to make false statements against our neighbours. Another meaning of justice is justice according to law ". It involves a legal system which deals with crime. Unlike moral rules, laws are compulsory for everyone. Under such a system, are crimes against the state, and only the state has the right to administer justice. On behalf of the society it judges and punishes people who break the law. However, most people believe that justice involves more than that. There is a concept of natural law or natural justice. This concept says that each individual has certain natural rights. Now the rules of natural justice, which mostly refers to the basic requirements of a fair trial: an open hearing, an impartial court, equality before the law, giving each side an equal chance to state its arguments. These requirements guarantee everyone the protection of the law. The relationship between morality and law has always been important. On the one hand, laws must be just. On the other hand, morality needs to uphold the rights and laws punish wrongs. Obviously, the law and morality support one another. Most people don't steal because they know that stealing is dishonest, and punishment for stealing reinforces them in this view. It is sometimes difficult to draw a line between morality and law. For example, in the modern world the video via the is should clearly but not illegal. Blasphemy is still a crime in England, but many people don't consider it illegal. Unfortunately, no legal system can always provide justice. Some cases go wrong, judges can make mistakes, people who should lose them, win. Individuals or organizations who can hire the best lawyers have an advantage over others. People with political connections and money often escape justice. The great eighteenth-century satirist Jonathan Swift said: "Laws are like cobwebs, which catch small flies may, but let wasps and hornets break through". Sometimes the law is unjust or its administration is unfair. A miscarriage of justice often makes people take the law into their own hands. They judge and punish other people themselves. This "vigilante justice" is certainly against the law. What if laws are unjust? What if we think that the administration of the law is unfair? We don't always agree with the laws we live by. In fact, we don't always know laws. However, we must live by these laws. If we feel that a law is unfair, we have the right to appeal against it or work to change it. We do not have the right to break it.
переводится, пожалуйста, подождите..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b964a/b964a31ad265972ddbf70955c8c4732ff4de7525" alt=""