Брак по принуждению-это термин, при

Брак по принуждению-это термин, применяемый для описания брачного союза, в котором одна или обе стороны женились без его или её согласия или против его или её воли при содействии их родителей или третьей стороны (свата) при подборе супруга, хотя разница между последними двумя может быть незначительной. Практика браков по принуждению была весьма распространённой среди высшего класса в Европе до XX в., и она до сих пор встречается в некоторых частях Юго-Восточной Азии, Ближнем Востоке, Африке. Браки по принуждению на Западе устраиваются, в основном, для выходцев из этих стран. Почти во всех браках невеста (реже жених) становится супругой не добровольно. ООН видит браки по принуждению как форму нарушения прав человека, поскольку они не соответствуют принципу свободы и независимости человека. Римская католическая церковь полагает, что основание для вынесения решения брака недействительным является вполне веским — для действительности брака обе стороны должны дать своё согласие свободно, без нажима со стороны. Исторически брак по принуждению устраивался для того, чтобы требовать от пленника (раба или военнопленного) слиться с обществом пребывания, и принять его или её судьбу. Одним из примеров служит английский кузнец Джон Р. Джевитт (англ. John R. Jewitt), который провёл три года в качестве пленника среди индейцев племени нутка на Тихоокеанском Северо-западном побережье в 1802—1805 гг. Его заставили жениться по решению совета вождей, считающих, что жена и семейная жизнь могут примирить его остаться на всю жизнь с теми, кто его взял в плен. Перед Джевиттом предстал выбор между согласием на брак по принуждению и смертной казнью для него и его «отца» (второго товарища, вместе с которым Джевитт попал в плен). Доведённый до такой крайности, со смертью с одной стороны и брачным союзом с другой стороны, я посчитал, что лучшим выходом будет выбрать меньшее из двух зол" (с.154)[9].

Результаты (английский) 1:

Forced marriage is a term used to describe a marriage in which one or both parties married without his or her consent or against his or her will, with the assistance of their parents or a third party (SWAT) when selecting a spouse, although the difference between the last two may be small. The practice of forced marriage was very common among the upper class in Europe until the 20th century, and it still occurs in some parts of Southeast Asia, the Middle East and Africa. Forced marriages in the West are arranged primarily for nationals of these countries. Almost all marriages groom (groom) becomes his wife not willingly. UN sees forced marriage as a form of human rights violations, because they do not comply with the principle of human freedom and independence. The Roman Catholic Church believes that the basis for the judgement of nullity is perfectly valid — for a marriage to be valid, both parties must give their consent freely, without pressure from the outside. Historically, forced marriage was arranged in order to require captive (slave or prisoner of war) to fuse with the host society, and take his or her destiny. One example is the English blacksmith John r. C. Jewitt (Engl. John r. Jewitt), who spent three years as a captive of Nootka tribe among the Indians on the Pacific Northwest Coast in 1802-1805 Gg. He was forced to marry by decision of the Council of chiefs, considering that his wife and family life can reconcile him to stay for the rest of your life with those who captured him. Before Dževittom brought a choice between accepting the forced marriage and the death penalty for him and his "father" (the second mate, with whom C. Jewitt was captured). Driven to such extremes, death on the one hand and marriage on the other hand, I felt that the best solution is to choose the lesser of two evils "(p. 154) [9].

Результаты (английский) 2:

Forced marriage is a term used to describe a marriage in which one or both parties were married without his or her consent or against his or her will, with the assistance of their parents or a third party (matchmaker) the selection of a spouse, although the difference between the last two It may be small. The practice of forced marriages was quite prevalent among the upper classes in Europe until the XX century., And it is still common in some parts of Southeast Asia, the Middle East and Africa. Forced marriages are held in the West, mostly for people from these countries. Almost all marriages the bride (groom less) becomes his wife, not willingly. UN sees forced marriage as a form of violation of human rights because they do not comply with the principle of freedom and independence of man. The Roman Catholic Church believes that the basis for the decision invalid marriage is quite compelling - for the validity of a marriage both parties must give their consent freely, without pressure from the outside. Historically, the forced marriage was arranged to demand from the captive (slave or prisoner of war) to merge with the host society, and to take his or her fate. One example is the English blacksmith John R. Jewitt (Eng. John R. Jewitt), who spent three years as a prisoner among the Nootka Indians in the Pacific Northwest coast in 1802-1805 gg. He was forced to get married by the decision of the council of chiefs, believes that his wife and family life can be reconciled him to stay for a lifetime with those who took him prisoner. Jewitt appeared before a choice between agreeing to forced marriage and death for him and his "father" (the second mate, with whom Jewitt was captured). Driven to the extreme of death on the one hand and by marriage on the other hand, I felt that the best solution is to choose the lesser of two evils "(p.154) [9].

Результаты (английский) 3:

forced marriage is a term used to describe the marriage,in which one or both parties got married without his or her consent or against his or her will, with the assistance of their parents or a third party (matchmaker) in selecting a spouse.although the difference between the last two would be negligible. the practice of forced marriage was very common among the upper classes in europe until the 20th century.and it still is in some parts of southeast asia, the middle east, africa. forced marriages in the west were mainly for nationals of those countries.in almost all marriages, the bride (less the groom) becomes the wife not voluntarily. un sees forced marriage as a form of human rights violations.because they do not comply with the principle of freedom and independence. the roman catholic church considersas a basis for a decision marriage is quite sufficient for the validity of marriage both parties must give their consent freely without interference from the outside.historically, forced marriage was looking for requiring the captive (slave or prisoner of war) in the host society, and to take his or her own destiny.one example is the english blacksmith john r. джевитт (). john r. Jewitt), who spent three years as a captive of the indian tribe nootka island on the pacific northwest coast in 1802 - 1805).he was forced to marry by decision of the council of chiefs, who believe that a wife and family life might bring him to stay for the rest of my life with the man who captured.before джевиттом appeared a choice between an agreement on forced marriage and the death penalty for him and his "father" (the second companion, with whom джевитт captured). доведённый to such extremewith the death of the marriage union on the one hand and, on the other hand, i thought that the best option is to choose the lesser of two evils "(с.154) [9].