low qualityhighinexpensiveбезусловн

low quality
high
inexpensive
безусловно, я думаю что роскошные товары дорогие, но дело не в их качестве, достаточно часто качество может быть плохим Я считаю что цена на роскошные товары складывается не столько от качества сколько от бренда, названия, марки
I believe that the price of luxury goods is not so much from the quality as from the brand names, trademarks
сколько от
what do you think the difference is
да я считаю они могут быть различными так как, на мой взгляд, недорогие товары обладают хорошим качеством и хорошей ценой, просто они не являются эксклюзивными или единичными товарами или товарами, сделанными из редких материалов, то есть это товары среднего класса. А дешевые товары чаще всего имеют плохое качество, могут быть даже вредными для здоровья
дефицитный

do you think goods which are value for money are cheap or expensive? are they low quality?
это сложный вопрос. скорее всего такие товары могут быть как недорогие, так и дешевые и не обызательно у них должно быть низкое качество
value for money

Результаты (английский) 1:

low quality
high
inexpensive
certainly, I think that luxury goods are expensive, but it's not in their qualityoften enough quality might be bad I think that the price of luxury goods consists not so much on the quality of many of the brand names, marks
i believe that the price of luxury goods is not so much from the quality as from the brand names, trademarks
but on
what do you think the difference is
yeah, I think they may be different because, in my opinion, cheap products are of good quality and good price,they just are not exclusive or single product or products made from rare materials, that is a middle-class goods. A cheap goods often are of poor quality,may even be harmful to the health deficit


do you think goods which are value for money are cheap or expensive? are they low quality?
is a complex issue. likely such goods can be as cheap,and cheap and not obyzatelnym they should have low quality
value for money

Результаты (английский) 2:

low quality high


definitely inexpensive, I think that luxury goods are expensive, but it's not their quality, quite often the quality may be bad, I believe that the price of luxury goods is not so much on the quality as the brand names, brand
I believe that the price of luxury goods is not so much from the quality as from the brand names, trademarks
How many from
what do you think the difference is
Yes I believe they may be different because, in my opinion, cheap goods are of good quality and good price, simply they are not exclusive or rare goods or goods made of rare materials, that is, the products of the middle class. And cheap goods often have poor quality, may even be unhealthy
scarce

do you think goods which are value for money are cheap or expensive? are they low quality?
is a complex issue. most likely such goods may be as cheap, and cheap and not obyzatel′no they must be poor value for money

Результаты (английский) 3:

Low quality
high
inexpensive
is certainly, I think that the luxury goods expensive, but the case was not in their capacity as,It is often the quality can be poor I believe that the price of luxury goods is not so much on the quality of much of our brand, the name, brand
i believe that the price of luxury goods is not so much from the quality as from the brand names, trademarks
Much of
what do you think the difference is
yes I believe they can be different as, in my view, low-cost products have a good quality and good price,Simply they are not exclusive or isolated in goods or goods, made from rare materials, this is the middle-class goods. A cheap goods most often have poor quality,May even be harmful for health
scarcest

do you think goods which are value for money Mware сheаp or expensive? Mware renounce low quality?
this is a complicated issue. As soon as possible, such goods may not be as cost-effective,And cheap and not обызательно to them should be low quality
value for money