В нашей жизни давно обосновалось такое понятие, как «реалити-шоу». Оно прочно вошло в нашу действительность посредством масс-медиа (телевидение, интернет, печать) и практически стало неотъемлемой ее частью. Но можно ли считать это явление благом или же стоит начать принимать меры по его искоренению?
Для начала нужно разобраться, что же представляет из себя реалити-шоу. Реалити-шоу - это вид телевизионной передачи или трансляции в интернете, в которой участвуют обыкновенные люди (знаменитости или случайные персонажи), не наделенные актерским талантом (то есть ведущие себя максимально естественно и не наигранно), поставленные в особые условия режиссерами данного проекта. Участники шоу, как правило, соревнуются между собой за главный приз, и каждую неделю один или несколько из них покидают проект посредством голосования (участников или зрителей) или на состязательной основе. Главной особенностью реалити-шоу считается отсутствие сценария и полная автономность и натуральность, а также свобода действий героев, в отличие от тех же фильмов и спектаклей. Но так ли это?
Само реалити-шоу позиционирует себя как наблюдение за жизнью, естественно, чужой. В его основе заложен магнит, притягивающий людей еще с незапамятных времен, и имя ему - любопытство, но при всем при том любопытство весьма нездоровое, проявляющееся в некоем «подглядывании» за жизнью других людей. Наблюдая реалити-шоу, люди неизменно задаются вопросами: «Сможет ли он/она перебороть себя?», «Повезет ли ему/ей?», «Смогут ли они быть вместе?» и так далее. Они не просто смотрят, а напрямую участвуют эмоционально, могут сравнивать себя с этими людьми и ставить себя на их место, подражать и копировать их. Для одних реалити-шоу даже может стать смыслом жизни, для других - неким ее эталоном. И тут просматривается сразу два негативных последствия - внушение фальшивых и ложных ценностей и воспитание людей, способных только наблюдать за другими, забыв про собственную, не менее интересную жизнь. Кто-то скажет, что в этом нет ничего ужасного, ведь аналогичная ситуация происходит и с кинематографом, но в фильмах нет живых людей, есть только герои, рассказывающие определенную историю жизни. В большинстве фильмов показаны настоящие чувства нереальных, вымышленных людей. На мой взгляд, в реалити-шоу события развиваются с точностью до наоборот - проявляя якобы «настоящие» эмоции, реальные люди становятся «рабочими» на фабрике фальшивой жизни. Причина этого лежит на поверхности и всем давно известна - меркантильность.
Так как любой организатор проекта заинтересован в его коммерческом успехе, он, само собой, должен каким-либо образом подогревать интерес к своему творению. Линейное развитие сюжета что в фильме, что в шоу мало кому понравится, другое дело - периодические конфликты, драки, ссоры, перепалки, склоки и личные драмы, борьба с внутренними и внешними факторами. Это и есть залог успеха любого реалити-шоу, секрет которого был подсказан еще древними римлянами, собиравшими толпы людей в Колизее, приходивших туда с одной целью - наблюдать чужие боль и страдания. Хотя в случае с гладиаторами страдания были значительно чудовищнее и ужаснее, нежели сейчас, а шоу было более чем реальным, сам принцип существенно не изменился, просто принял другую, весьма смягченную форму. Формула «хлеба и зрелищ» никуда не делась, а напротив, преобразилась и заиграла новыми красками. Реалити-шоу стало нормой жизни, новым видом развлечения, в этом вся его суть - в удовольствии созерцания, не более того. Ни одно реалити-шоу не заставляет серьезно задуматься, не дает знание об окружающем мире, не обогащает интеллектуально или духовно, ведь перед ним и не ставят такую цель. И в этом, как мне кажется, состоит еще одна опасность реалити-шоу как одного из элементов интернет-трансляций и телевидения - отвлечение внимания людей от реальных проблем.
Существует еще одна разновидность реалити-шоу, когда действие крутится вокруг людей, не подозревающих о своей «популярности». Они могут находиться на работе, у себя дома либо на улице, не ведая, что обычное течение их жизни наблюдают миллионы людей. Этот вид мне кажется самым кощунственным, потому что здесь идет прямое нарушение неприкосновенности частной жизни и свободы личности, а также возможна опасность нарушения психического здоровья. Примером этой ситуации может служить фильм «Шоу Трумана», где главный герой испытывает искренние чувства, потому что поначалу не сомневается, что все вокруг - настоящее, но затем с ужасом понимает, что вся его жизнь - это гигантский телепроект, а близкие ему люди - не более чем нанятые актеры.
В реалити-шоу нет ничего, что могло бы принести пользу людям, но их популярность от года к году неизменно растет. Единственное, чем они могут «похвастаться» - это способностью приковать внимание, буквально загипнотизировать зрителя, дав возможность развлечься и отдохнуть от повседневности, «отключить голову». Но стоит ли оно того потраченного времени, того бесценного времени, что можно потратить на чтение интересной книги или просмотра глубокого фильма, заставляющих открыть что-то новое для себя и почувствовать радость познания, на созерцание произведения искусства или простое человеческое общение - вот главный вопрос.
Результаты (
английский) 1:
[копия]Скопировано!
In our lives long ago settled such a notion as "reality show". It has firmly entered into our reality through the mass media (television, Internet, print) and virtually became an integral part of it. But can you believe this phenomenon is good or whether it is necessary to begin to take steps to eradicate it?First you need to understand what is a reality show. The reality show is a kind of television broadcast or broadcast on the Internet, involving ordinary people (celebrities or random characters), with no acting talent (i.e. behaving naturally and not factitiously) set out in the special conditions of the directors of this project. Show participants tend to compete with each other for the Grand Prize, and each week, one or more of them are leaving the project by voting (participants or viewers) or on a competitive basis. The main feature of reality show is considered the lack of script and full autonomy and authenticity, as well as freedom of action heroes, as opposed to those same films and performances. But is this true?Reality show itself presents itself as monitoring life, naturally, a stranger. It laid a magnet, attracting people from time immemorial, and name it-curiosity, but at the same time curiosity very unhealthy, as reflected in some sort of "having seen" the life of others. Watching reality shows, people invariably set: "whether he/she overcome yourself?", "you're lucky if he/her?", "can they be together?" and so on. They're not just watching, but directly involved emotionally, can compare themselves with these people and putting yourself in their shoes, to imitate and copy them. For some reality show may even become the meaning of life, for others it is a kind of its benchmark. And here you are viewing two negative consequences-suggestion of fraudulent and false values and nurturing people who can only monitor other, forgetting about your own life, not less interesting. Someone might say that this is nothing terrible, because a similar situation happens with film, but in the films no live people, there are only heroes, telling a life story. In most movies showing real feelings of unreal, fictional people. In my opinion, in the reality show unfolded exactly the opposite-showing "real" emotions, real people become "workers" in a factory fake life. The reason for this lies on the surface and all long known-it sunny where.Since any organizer interested in its commercial success, he, of course, must somehow warmed up interest in its creation. The linear development of the plot that the movie that shows a little like another recurrent conflicts, fight, quarrel, squabble, squabbling and personal dramas, combating internal and external factors. This is the keystone to success of any reality show, secret which was prompted by the Romans, still searching crowds at the Coliseum, came back with one goal in mind-to watch other people's pain and suffering. Although in the case of the gladiators were significantly worse than suffering and terrifying than now, but the show was more than real, the principle itself has not changed significantly, just took another, very relaxed form. The formula of "bread and circuses" went nowhere, but, on the contrary, changed and began to play with new colors. Reality show became a norm of life, a new type of entertainment in all its essence-the pleasure of contemplation, not more. No reality show did not seriously think about giving knowledge about the world, not intellectually or spiritually enriched, because before him and not put such a goal. And this, it seems to me, is another danger of reality shows as part of Internet broadcasts and television-a distraction from the real issues of the people.There is another kind of reality show, when the action revolves around people, unsuspecting on its "popularity". They may be at work, at home or on the street, not knowing that standard throughout their life watching millions of people. This view seems to me the most blasphemous because it is a direct violation of privacy and individual liberties, as well as the possible danger of mental health. An example of this situation can serve as a film "the Truman Show, where the main character feels sincere feelings, because initially, had no doubt that everything around is real, but then with horror realizes that his entire life is a giant television, and close to him people-nothing more than hired actors.In the reality show there is nothing that could benefit people, but their popularity from year to year has been consistently growing. The only thing they can "boast" is the ability to capture attention, literally hypnotize the Viewer, giving the opportunity to have some fun and take a break from everyday life, "disable." But is it worth it so time spent, that invaluable time that can be spent on reading a good book or watching the movie deep, forcing open something new for yourself and feel the joy of knowledge, contemplation of artworks or simple human communication-that's the main question.
переводится, пожалуйста, подождите..
Результаты (
английский) 2:
[копия]Скопировано!
In our lives for a long time to justify such a thing as "reality show." It has become a part of our reality through the media (television, internet, print), and almost become an integral part of it. But can we consider this phenomenon is good or we should start to take steps to eradicate it?
First you need to understand what is a reality show. Reality TV - a kind of telecast or broadcast on the Internet, which brings together ordinary people (celebrities or random characters) are not endowed with acting talent (ie behave most naturally and willfully), set in the special conditions of the directors of the project. Participants of the show, as a rule, are competing for the main prize, and every week one or more of them are leaving the project by voting (participants or spectators) or on a competitive basis. The main feature of the reality show is the lack of script and the full autonomy and naturalness, as well as freedom of action heroes, as opposed to those same films and performances. But is it?
Of course the reality show has positioned itself as the observation of the life, of course, a stranger. It laid the basis of a magnet attracting people since time immemorial, and his name - a curiosity, but for all that curiosity is very unhealthy, which manifests itself in a kind of "spying" for the lives of others. Watching reality shows, people always ask, "Will he / she has to overcome itself?" "Lucky if he / she is?", "Will they be together?" And so on. They do not just look, but directly involved emotionally, can compare themselves with these people and put ourselves in their place, to imitate and copy them. For some, the reality show might even be the meaning of life, for others - a kind of its benchmark. And then once seen two negative consequences - a suggestion of false and false values and education of people who are able only to watch others, forgetting their own, not less interesting life. Some would say that there is nothing terrible, because a similar situation occurs with the film, but the film does not live people, there are only heroes, telling the story of a certain life. Most films are shown true feelings unreal, fictional people. In my opinion, in the reality show developments are exactly the opposite - allegedly showing "real" emotions, real people become "working" at the factory fake life. The reason for this lies on the surface, and all have long known - commercialism.
Since every project organizer is interested in its commercial success, it is, by itself, should in any way to warm interest in his creation. The linear development of the plot in the movie that show very few people like, and another thing - the periodic conflicts, fights, quarrels, squabbles, quarrels and personal drama, the struggle against internal and external factors. This is the key to the success of any reality show, the secret of which was prompted by the ancient Romans, the gathering crowd of people at the Coliseum, came there with one purpose - to observe other people's pain and suffering. Although in the case of Gladiators were suffering much more monstrous and more horrible than now, and the show was more than real, the principle has not changed, just took another very gentle way. The formula of "bread and circuses" will not go away, but rather changed and began to play with new colors. Reality TV has become a way of life, a new form of entertainment, that's the essence of it - the pleasure of contemplation, not more. None of the reality show does not make think seriously, does not give knowledge about the world, it does not enrich intellectually or spiritually, because in front of him and do not put the goal. And this, I think, is another danger of the reality show as one of the elements of Internet broadcasts and television - diverting people's attention from the real issues.
There is another kind of reality show, when the action revolves around the people who are not unaware of his "popularity". They may be at work, at home or on the street, not knowing that the ordinary course of their lives, millions of people are watching. This type seems to me the most blasphemous, because there is a direct violation of privacy and personal freedom, as well as the possible risk of mental health problems. An example of this situation is the movie "The Truman Show", where the protagonist is experiencing sincere feelings, because at first no doubt that everything - present, but then with horror realizes that his whole life - it's a giant television project, and people close to him - nothing more than a hired actors.
The reality show there is nothing that would benefit people, but their popularity from year to year is steadily increasing. The only thing they can "boast" - the ability to capture the attention of literally hypnotize the audience, giving them an opportunity to have fun and take a break from everyday life, "turn off his head." But whether it's worth the time, that precious time that could be spent on reading an interesting book or watching a deep movie that lead to discover something new for yourself and feel the joy of learning, to the contemplation of works of art or simple human communication - that's the main issue.
переводится, пожалуйста, подождите..
Результаты (
английский) 3:
[копия]Скопировано!
in our life time обосновалось such a concept as "reality шоу». it is entrenched in our reality through the mass media (tv, internet, print and almost become an integral part of it.but whether it is a blessing or the need to take steps to eradicate it?
you must first figure out what is a reality show.reality tv is a television broadcast or transmission in the internet, with the participation of ordinary people (celebrities or random characters)don't have acting talent (i.e., behaving as natural as possible and diabolical) set in the special conditions of directors of the project. the show typicallycompete among themselves for the big prize, and each week one or more of them leave the project through a vote (participants or spectators) or adversarial.the main feature of the show is written and a lack of autonomy and the nature, and the freedom of action heroes, in contrast to the same movies and plays. but is it?
the reality show has positioned himself as the observation of life, of course, not. it is based on a magnet attracting people since time immemorial, and the name of his curiosity.but with all the curiosity is very unhealthy, reflected in a "подглядывании» for other people's lives. observing reality show, people are always asking the questions: "can he / she get over it, right? ""lucky to him / her? "," if they can be together? "and so on. they don't just watch, but directly involved emotionally, can compare yourself with these people and to put yourself in their shoes, imitate and copy them.for some, a reality show, even can be the meaning of life for the other - one of its benchmark. and it has two negative effects to cause false and false values and educating peoplecan only watch others, forgetting his own not less interesting life. someone says that there is nothing terrible, because a similar situation happens, and cinematography.but in the movies no living people, only the heroes, telling a story of life. in most films, shows the real feelings of unrealistic, fictional people. in my opinion,in reality things are going backwards, with alleged "настоящие» emotion, real people are" рабочими» a fake life.the reason for this lies on the surface and all long known - меркантильность.
because all the project is interested in his commercial success, he naturallyhave any way to hold the interest of his work. the linear development of plot in the movie that shows few people like different recurrent conflicts, fighting, fighting, arguing,drama and personal drama, the internal and external factors. this is the key to the success of any reality show, secret which was prompted by the more ancient romans extracting crowds at the coliseum.come up with one objective - to observe other people's pain and suffering. although in the case of gladiators has been significantly чудовищнее and worse than now, but the show was more than a reality.the principle has not changed significantly, just adopted another very watered down form. the formula of "bread and зрелищ» won't go, but on the contrary is transformed and playing with new colors. reality show has become the norm.a new type of entertainment, that's all it is about the pleasure of contemplation, not more. no reality show making seriously does not have the knowledge about the world.not enriches intellectually or spiritually, and in front of him and didn't have such a goal. and this, i think,is another risk reality show how one of the elements of the internet broadcast and television is a distraction from the real issues. "there is another kind of reality showwhen the action revolves around people, not подозревающих its "популярности». they can be at work, at home or on the street, not knowing that the usual period of their lives watching millions of people.this view seems to me the most blasphemous, because there is a direct violation of the inviolability of private life and personal liberty, as well as the possible risk of mental health disorders.an example of this situation can be a film show трумана», where the main character is sincere feelings, because at first had no doubt that everything is real, but then realizes with horror.that his whole life is a телепроект and close his people - not more than hired actors.
in the reality show nothing that would benefit the people, but their popularity has been increasing from year to year.the only thing they can "похвастаться» is the ability to hold court, literally hypnotize audience, allowing fun and relax from the daily life, turn head.but is it worth the time spent, the valuable time that could be spent reading an interesting book or viewing of the film.which discover for themselves and feel the joy of learning, in the contemplation of art or mere human companionship - that is the question.
переводится, пожалуйста, подождите..