Главное, к чему надо стремиться в и

Главное, к чему надо стремиться в искусстве,- это к верному постижению прекрасного в природе
Тернер, так же как Рейнолдс, пользовался огромным успехом у публики и его произведения часто становились сенсацией выставок в Королевской Академии. Подобно Рейнолдсу, он был приверженцем традиции.Главным предметом его желаний было сравняться с прославленными пейзажами Клода Лоррена, если не превзойти их.
Тернер также изображает фантастический мир, залитый светом и блистающий красотой, однако его мир - это не покой, но движение, не просто гармония, но ослепительное великолепие
Природа у Тернера всегда отражает и выражает чувства человека. Мы ощущаем себя крошечными и подавленными перед лицом сил, которые нам не подвластны, и должны восхищаться художником, подчиняющим себе силы природы.
Совершенно иным был подход Констебла. Для него традиция, с которой Тернер соперничал, была не более, чем помехой.
Он, безусловно, восхищался великими мастерами прошлого, однако хотел писать то, что видел своими глазами, а не глазами Клода Лоррена.

Результаты (английский) 1:

Importantly, what you seek in art is to the correct comprehension of beauty in natureTurner, like Reynolds, enjoyed huge success with the public and his works often became the sensation exhibition at the Royal Academy. Like Rejnoldsu, he was a supporter of traditions. the main subject of his desires was to catch up with the famous landscapes of Claude Lorrain, if not exceed them. Turner also portrays a fantasy world, flooded with light and shining beauty, but his peace is not peace, but a movement, not just harmony but dazzling splendorThe nature of the Turner always reflects and expresses the feelings of a person. We feel tiny and depressed in the face of forces beyond their control, and we should admire the artist, podčinâûŝim strength of nature.An entirely different approach was Constable. It is a tradition that Turner was, was nothing more than a nuisance.He certainly admired the great masters of the past, but wanted to write something that he saw with his own eyes and not through the eyes of Claude Lorrain.

Результаты (английский) 2:

The main thing is what we should strive in art - is to the correct comprehension of beauty in nature
Turner, as well as Reynolds, enjoyed great success with the public and his works were often sensational exhibition at the Royal Academy. Like Reynolds, he was a supporter of traditsii.Glavnym object of his desires was to catch up with the famous landscapes of Claude Lorrain, if not surpass them.
Turner also shows a fantasy world, filled with light and shining beauty, but his world - it is not peace, but the movement, not just harmony, but the dazzling splendor of
nature at Turner always reflect and express the feelings of a man. We feel tiny and overwhelmed in the face of forces that we are not subject to, and have to admire the artist, to subdue the forces of nature.
It is a different approach was Constable. For him, the tradition which Turner contended, was nothing more than a nuisance.
He certainly admired the great masters of the past, but wanted to write what I saw with my own eyes and not through the eyes of Claude Lorrain.

Результаты (английский) 3:

The main, to which we must strive in the art,- this is the correct Kinets beautiful in nature
Turner, as well as Reynolds,enjoyed tremendous success at the Gallery, and his works have often been sensational exhibitions at the Royal Academy. Like Mr. U. Svidén, he was committed to tradition.The main object of his desire was equalize with artwork landscapes Claude With, if not surpass them.
Turner also depicts a fantastic world, sky-lit and roomy beauty,But his peace is not peace, but the movement, not just a harmony, but why not shine like a superstar? splendor
nature from Turner always reflects and expresses a sense of human rights. We feel tiny and digging in the face of the forces,That we are not immune, and must admire artist, pri itself forces of nature.
quite different was the approach mill at Gillingham. For him tradition, with which Turner Afrika Bambaata, was no more than an impediment.
it,Of course, che great artists last year, however, I would like to write that he saw with his own eyes, and not with their eyes, Claude.