Рассматривая административное право

Рассматривая административное правонарушение как совокупность аномальных общественных отношений, следует обратить внимание на отрицательную целевую функцию этих связей. Во всех случаях эта функция выступает как помеха в осуществлении запрограммированного в юридических нормах административного правопорядка. Но всякий раз она индивидуализируется в зависимости от субъекта и объекта правонарушения.
Можно выделить три вида административных правоотношений, обладающих отрицательной целевой функцией. К ним относятся связи: направленные против установленных принципов, форм и методов государственного управления; мешающие осуществлению целей отдельных государственных и общественных органов; нарушающие законные интересы и права граждан.
Наибольшую опасность представляют правоотношения первой группы. Как правило, они имеют место при издании незаконных нормативных актов управления, которые приводят к нарушению основных принципиальных установлений управленческой воли государства. Помехи в осуществлении целей тех или иных органов управления общественных и самодеятельных организаций обычно связаны с нарушением их компетенции. Чаще всего они наблюдаются в ходе правоприменительной деятельности исполнительно-распорядительных органов. Нарушение субъективного административного права всегда выступает как принуждение.
С учетом особенностей отрицательной целевой функции аномальных правоотношений можно выделить административные правонарушения: а) принципов, форм и методов советского государственного управления; б) компетенции исполнительно-распорядительных органов, общественных и самодеятельных организаций, которым предоставлены государственно-властные полномочия; в) субъективных прав и обязанностей граждан.
Для всех видов правонарушений характерно столкновение двух начал: правомерной и неправомерной воли. Воля является основным двигателем возникновения, изменения и прекращения комплекса противоправных связей. Но она должна быть проявлена в конкретном поведении субъектов административных правоотношений, ибо сама по себе, воплощенная только в мысли или желании, не имеет никакого юридического значения.
Административное право как управленческая воля является концентрированным выражением определенных экономически и исторически обусловленных организационных тенденций развития государства. Преобразуясь в повседневную деятельность исполнительно-распорядительных органов, компетентных общественных организаций, отдельных граждан, они обретают конкретное социальное выражение. В системе правоотношений, выражающих административное правонарушение, взаимодействуют такие волевые проявления, которые основаны на потребностях, интересе, имеют мыслительное и психологическое содержание. Это наводит на мысль о непосредственной связи аномальных ситуаций с уровнем социалистического правосознания участников административных правоотношений.
Индивидуальное правосознание имеет сложную структуру. Оно складывается из системы взглядов и привычек, психологических свойств человека, информированности его о нормах права. Оно отражает условия человеческой жизни и всегда связано с происходящими в обществе процессами. В этом смысле индивидуальное правосознание неразрывно связано и с общественным правосознанием. На него оказывают влияние общий уровень представлений об административном праве, законности в сфере государственного управления и взгляды той социальной микрогруппы, участником которой является гражданин.
В формировании индивидуального правосознания большую роль играют служащие органов управления, которые осуществляют исполнительно-распорядительные функции и принимают индивидуально-конкретные решения в отношении граждан. Тем самым их правосознание является непосредственным фактором формирования правосознания других лиц.
Административные правонарушения как система общественных связей возникают и развиваются не сами по себе, а в тесной связи с другими социальными отношениями. Они отражают состояние последних, их динамику и структуру. Исходя из сложившегося в литературе группирования административных отношений по сферам управления можно выделить три разновидности правонарушений. Одни из них возникают в системе управления народным хозяйством, другие -- в процессе руководства социально-культурными учреждениями, третьи -- в ходе реализации административно-политических функций исполнительно-распорядительного аппарата. Содержание каждой из них индивидуализируется субъектами, объектом, требованиями нормы права.
Административное правонарушение объективизируется в двух формах социального проявления: издании акта государственного управления или совершении проступка, мешающих осуществлению управленческой воли государства. Оба эти юридических факта являются основанием возникновения деликтных правоотношений. В процессе их развития могут наступить два вида последствий: моральная или юридическая ответственность.
За административные правонарушения, совершенные гражданами или должностными лицами, наступает административная ответственность, связанная с возможностью применения наказания. В ряде юридических норм закрепляются санкции,. которые определяют меру ответственности и тем самым" регламентируют механизм восстановления нарушенного права.
Подводя итог сказанному, административное правонарушение можно определить как систему деликтных правоотношений, в процессе развития которой нарушается объективное или субъект

Результаты (английский) 1:

Considering the administrative offence of abnormal social relations, attention should be drawn to the negative target function of these relationships. In all cases, this function acts as a hindrance in implementing programmed in legal provisions of administrative law. But whenever she adapted depending on subject and object of the offence.There are three types of administrative legal relations with the negative target function. These include connection: against established principles, forms and methods of public management; impeding the implementation of the objectives of individual Government and public bodies; violate the legal interests and rights of citizens.The greatest danger is the legal relationship of the first group. They usually occur when management regulations illegal publication, that violate the basic principle of the management regulations of the will of the State. Interference in the implementation of the objectives of those or other organs of the public and amateur organizations typically associated with violation of their competence. They often occur in the course of law enforcement executive-administrative bodies. Subjective violation of administrative law always acts as coercion. Taking into account the characteristics of the negative target function anomalous legal relations it is possible to allocate administrative offences: a) principles, forms and methods of the Soviet Government; b) competence of the Executive and administrative bodies, public and amateur organizations, which provided public authority; in) the subjective rights and responsibilities of citizens.For all types of offences characterized by a clash of two principles: lawful and unlawful will. Will is the prime mover of the emergence, change and termination of complex illegal connections. But it must be exercised in a particular behaviours of subjects of administrative legal relations, because by itself embodied only in thought or desire, has no legal value.Administrative law as management will is a concentrated expression of certain economically and historically due to organizational development trends in the State. Converted into the daily activities of the Executive and administrative bodies, competent public organizations, individual citizens, they become a concrete social expression. In the system of legal relations, expressing an administrative offence, interact such volitional manifestations, which are based on the needs, interest, have the mental and psychological content. This suggests a direct link of an anomalous situation with Socialist awareness level participants of the administrative legal relations.Individual consciousness has a complex structure. It consists of the belief systems and habits, psychological human properties, his awareness of the law. It reflects the conditions of human life, and is always associated with ongoing processes in the society. In this sense, the individual consciousness is inseparably linked with the public and legal consciousness. Influence on him, the overall level of understanding of administrative law, the rule of law in the sphere of public administration and the views of the social mikrogruppy of which is a citizen.In the formation of individual awareness of the role of servants of management bodies that carry out executive-administrative functions and take individually-specific decisions with regard to citizens. Thus their consciousness is a direct factor in shaping legal awareness of others.Administrative offences as a system of social relations arise and develop themselves, and in close connection with other social relations. They reflect the State of the past, their dynamics and structure. On the basis of the current grouping in the literature in the areas of administrative relations management can be divided into three varieties of offences. Some of them arise in the management of the national economy, others-in the management of socio-cultural institutions, third-in the course of implementing the political and administrative functions of the Executive and administrative apparatus. The contents of each of these actors individualized object that the requirements of the rule of law.Administrative offence ob″ektiviziruetsâ in two forms of social manifestations: the publication of the public administration Act of misconduct or impeding the implementation of the management of the will of the State. Both these legal facts are the Foundation of the emergence of tort legal relations. In their development process may be two types of effects: moral or legal responsibility. For administrative offences committed by nationals or officials, comes the administrative responsibilities associated with the possibility of imposing a penalty. In a number of legal regulations lays down the sanctions. that define the responsibility and thereby "regulate the recovery mechanism of the right violated.To sum up, an administrative offence can be defined as a system of tort legal relations in development which violated an objective or actor

Результаты (английский) 2:

Considering the administrative offense as a set of abnormal social relations, should pay attention to the negative objective function of these connections. In all cases, this function acts as a hindrance in the implementation of programmed in the legal norms of administrative law enforcement. But whenever it is individualized, depending on the subject and the object of the offense.
There are three types of administrative relations, having a negative objective function. These include communication: against the established principles, forms and methods of governance; affecting the implementation of the objectives of certain state and public bodies; violate the legitimate rights and interests of citizens.
The greatest danger is the legal relationship of the first group. They usually take place in the publication of illegal regulations management, which lead to the violation of the fundamental principle of administrative establishments will of the state. Interference in the implementation of the different organs of the public and amateur organizations are usually associated with the violation of their competence. Most often, they occur in the course of enforcement of executive and administrative bodies. Violation subjective administrative law always acts as coercion.
Given the nature of the objective function abnormal negative relationships can be distinguished administrative offense: a) principles, forms and methods of the Soviet government; b) the competence of the executive and administrative bodies, public and amateur organizations with public authority; c) subjective rights and duties of citizens.
For all kinds of offenses is characterized by the clash of two principles: legitimate and illegitimate will. Will is the main engine of creation, change and termination of the complex illegal connections. But it must be taken in the specific behavior of the subjects of administrative legal relations, for itself, embodied only in thought or desire, has no legal value.
Administrative law as a management will is the concentrated expression of certain economically and historically determined institutional trends in the development of the state. Transforming into the daily activities of the executive and administrative bodies, the competent public organizations and individual citizens, they acquire a particular social expression. The legal system, expressing an administrative offense, interact such volitional manifestations which are based on the needs, interests, and have thought-psychological content. This suggests a direct relationship with the level of abnormal situations socialist legal awareness of participants of administrative legal relations.
The individual sense of justice is a complex structure. It consists of the belief systems and habits, the psychological properties of the person, his knowledge of the law. It reflects the conditions of human life and is always associated with the ongoing processes in the society. In this sense, the individual sense of justice is inseparably linked with the public sense of justice. They are influenced by the general level of the administrative law, the rule of law in public administration and the views of the social micro-groups, a participant who is a citizen.
In the formation of the individual sense of justice play an important role serving governments that carry out executive and administrative functions and take individual specific solutions in relation to citizens. Thus, their sense of justice is a direct factor in the formation of legal consciousness of others.
Administrative offenses as a system of social relations does not arise and develop on their own, and in close connection with other social relations. They reflect the state of the latter, their dynamics and structure. Based on existing literature grouping administrative relations in the spheres of management, there are three kinds of offenses. Some of them appear in the system of economic management, the other - in the management of social and cultural institutions, and others - in the implementation of administrative and political functions of the executive and administrative apparatus. The contents of each individualized subject, object, the requirements of law.
An administrative offense is objectified in two forms of social existence: the publication of an act of government misconduct or impeding the implementation of the will of the state management. Both these legal facts are the basis of origin Tort relations. In the process of development can occur two types of consequences: moral or legal responsibility.
For administrative offenses committed by nationals or officials, administrative liability associated with the possibility of punishment. A number of legal norms fixed penalties ,. which determine the degree of responsibility and thus "regulate the mechanism of redress.
To sum ​​up, an administrative offense could be defined as a system of tort law relations, in the development process where the objective is broken or entity

Результаты (английский) 3:

considering the administrative offence as a set of abnormal social interaction, attention should be paid to the negative task function of those links.in all cases, this function is as a hindrance in the implementation of the machines in the legal norms administrative rule of law.but every time she индивидуализируется depending on the subject and the object of the offence. "there are three types of administrative legal relations, the non negative function. these include the:against set principles, forms and methods of public administration; to the implementation of the government and public bodies.violate the legitimate interests and rights of citizens. the greatest danger is legal relationship the first group. they usually occur in the illegal regulations managementwhich lead to a violation of the basic principle of management from the will of the state.interference in the implementation of the objectives of the government or other public and independent organizations normally associated with a violation of their competence.they most often occur in the course of enforcement by the executive and administrative bodies. violation of administrative law is always perceived coercion.
in accordance with the characteristics of negative target function abnormal relations are administrative offences: (a) the principles, the forms and methods of the soviet government.(b) the competence of the executive and administrative bodies, voluntary and independent organizations, which provided public authority; the subjective rights and duties of citizens.for all types of offences is the collision of two started: permissible will. will is the main engine of the modification and termination of illegal connections.but it should be displayed in a particular behavior subjects of administrative legal relations; itself is embodied only in thought or desire, has no legal meaning.administrative law is the concentrated expression of the will of both the management of certain economically and historically due to the institutional development of the state.преобразуясь in the daily activities of executive and administrative bodies of public organizations and individual citizens, they are the social expression. in the system of legal relationssystem for administrative offences are those strong willed manifestations, which are based on the needs, interest, have мыслительное and psychological content.this suggests a close connection with the level of abnormal situations of the lawfulness of administrative legal relations. "the individual правосознание has a complex structure.it consists of system views and habits, and psychological characteristics of rights, awareness of the law.it reflects the conditions of human life and always associated with ongoing social processes. in this sense, the individual правосознание is inextricably linked with the public правосознанием.to influence overall perceptions of administrative law, the rule of law in the field of public administration and the views of the social микрогруппы, to which it was a citizen. "in the formation of individual awareness important role play employee governancewho are the executive and administrative functions and take individual specific decisions on the citizens.thus правосознание is a direct factor in the formation of the awareness of others.
administrative offences as a system of public relations arise and are not in themselvesand in close connection with the other social relations. they reflect the state of the past, their dynamics and structure.on the basis of the literature clustering administrative relations on areas of administration can be divided into three types of offences. some of them arise in the management of national economy.others are in the process of social and cultural institutions, and in the realization of the political functions of the executive and the board of management.the contents of each of them индивидуализируется actors, the object, the requirements of the rule of law. "the administrative offence объективизируется in two forms of social manifestations.the act of the government or misconduct to the implementation of the management of the state. these two legal facts are the basis of the alien tort law.in the development process may be two kinds of consequences: a moral or legal responsibility.
for administrative offences committed by nationals or officials.the administrative liability associated with the possibility of the application of punishment. in a number of legal norms are the sanctions.which determine the responsibility and thus "governs the mechanism reconstruction of law." in sum,administrative offence can be defined as a system with tort law, in the process of development, which is an objective or subject