Зоопарк, это развлечение для людей

Зоопарк, это развлечение для людей и приют для животных. Но, нужен ли животным такой приют или им было бы лучше на воле?
Безусловно, зоопарки-это места спасения для многих животных. На воле, многим животным угрожает опасность. Это могут быть браконьеры, или изменения их среды обитания, брошенный родителями молодняк или изгнанный из стаи, борьба за территорию. Но в зоопарках они в безопасности, за ними ухаживают, лечат, кормят, присматривают. Для многих животных, зоопарк-единственный способ выжить. Так же, люди, приходя в зоопарк, узнают много нового о животных и окружающем мире.
Но, содержание животных в неволе, имеет минусы и не один. Во-первых, проблема открытых зоопарков, в том, что это место отдыха для людей. Не каждый посетитель следует правилам зоопарка, он может скормить животному запрещенную еду, дразнить животное, фотографироваться с ними. Животные устают от такого количества публики. Во-вторых, дикие животные живя в зоопарке, становятся домашними. За них все делает человек, животные утрачивают свои природные инстинкты, становясь зависимыми от человека, и некоторые животные не смогут выжить, оказавшись снова на воле. Так же, животным скучно в зоопарках, их загоны зачастую слишком малы, это не просторные степи и леса, где можно бегать, где нет границ.
Итак, зоопарки нужны, они спасают и сохраняют многие виды животных. Но, взамен животных лишают свободы, и делают из них шоу. Думаю, лучше создавать больше природных заповедников.

Результаты (английский) 1:

The Zoo is fun for people and animal shelter. But whether such animal shelter or they would be better off at will? Of course, zoos are places of salvation for many animals. In the wild, many animals are at risk. This may be the poachers, or changes their habitats posed by parents of young or banished from the Pack, fighting for territory. But in zoos they are safe, caring for them, heal, feed and look after. For many animals, Zoo-the only way to survive. The same people coming to the Zoo, learn a lot about animals and the environment. But, the content of the animals in captivity, has cons and not one. Firstly, the problem of zoos, in that it is a place for people. Not every visitor follows the Zoo, he can eat no animal food, teasing the animal to be photographed with them. Animals get tired of so many public. Secondly, wild animals living in the Zoo, are homemade. For them all makes people, animals lose their natural instincts and become dependent on humans and some animals may not be able to survive back in the wild. As well, animals get bored in zoos, their corrals are often too small, this is not a spacious steppe and forest, where you can jog, where there are no boundaries. So, zoos are needed, they save and preserve many kinds of animals. But instead of the animals has been deprived of his liberty, and make of them a show. I think it is better to create more nature reserves.

Результаты (английский) 3:

The Zoo, this is entertainment for people and shelter for the animals. But, whether there was a need for such a shelter animals or they would be better at the will of the?
Certainly, zoos, this space saving for many animals. On the will of States,Many animals are in danger. This can be poachers, or changes in their environment, throwing parents fledglings or ousted from rare, the struggle for territory. But in zoos they are in the Security Council,Are cared for, treat, fed, are cared for by. For many animals, the zoo, the only way to survive. The same people, coming to the zoo, have much to learn from the animals and the surrounding world.
But,The content of the animals in captivity, has disadvantages and not one. In the first place, the problem open zoos, in that this is a resting place for the people. It is not every visitor should be rules the zoo.He may deals animal prohibited food, kind heart animal, passport photo taken with them. Animals were tired from such a number of public. Secondly, wild animals living in the zoo, they are home.For them all makes people, animals lose their natural instincts, by becoming dependent on rights, and some animals will not be able to survive, once again at will. The same animals were bored in zoos,Their animal pens are often too small, this is not the spacious steppe and forest, where you can run, where there are no boundaries.
So, zoos are needed, they may well do harm and maintain many types of animals. But, as a substitute for animals are deprived of liberty,And make of them show. I think, it is best to create more natural reserves.