The London phonological SchoolThe London School of Phonology was heade перевод - The London phonological SchoolThe London School of Phonology was heade английский как сказать

The London phonological SchoolThe L

The London phonological School

The London School of Phonology was headed by Prof. Daniel Jones and represents the physical conception of the phoneme.

In his monograph “The Phoneme: its nature and use” Jones writes that the idea of the phoneme was first introduced to him in 1911 by Prof Scerba in Leningrad. He sticks to the original mentalistic definition of the phoneme but he finds it inconvenient for practical purposes. His definition of a phoneme is the following: phoneme is a family of sounds in a given language which are related in character and are used in such a way that no one member ever occurs in a word in the same phonetic context as any other member.

In his “An Outline of English Phonetics” he gives a similar definition: a phoneme is a family of sounds consisting of an important sound of the language together with other related sounds which take place in particular sound-sequences or under particular conditions of length or stress. He emphasizes the fact that different members of the same phoneme are mutually exclusive. For example, the [k] which is used in keep cannot be used in call where we use a labialized [k].

His theory of a phoneme may be called “atomistic”. He breaks up the phoneme into atoms and considers different features of phonemes as independent phenomena. He speaks of different qualities of the same phoneme as “phones”, a number of which forms the corresponding phoneme. He also speaks of different degrees of length as “chrones” which are combined into “chronemes” that are distinctive in a language, for example, the long and the short chronemes in English. In the same way he distinguishes tones and tonemes in tone languages and strones and stronemes (for different degrees of stress).

Length and tone have no importance without other sound features. They exist only in phonemes and all their characteristic features taken together make up a phoneme which is linguistically distinctive.

According to Jones, the problem of phonemes is connected with philosophy, so that a linguist cannot cope with it. His object is to give the phoneme a purely practical application: it is useful in teaching languages, in creating phonetic transcription.

The phoneme theory in America was headed by Edward Sepir and Leonard Bloomfield. It is characterized as structuralism. An American structuralism is based on behaviourism. The linguistic processes of the mind are unobservable. Our only information about the mind is derived from the behavior of the individual whom it inhabits. Another representative of this trend asserts : “Pattern is habit, structure is behavior, pattern is langue, structure is parole, pattern is culture, structure is behavioral manifestation of culture”.

Leonard Bloomfiled defines the phoneme as minimum unit of distinctive sound-feature, but W.F. Twaddell defines it as an abstractional fiction.
0/5000
Источник: -
Цель: -
Результаты (английский) 1: [копия]
Скопировано!
The London School phonologicalThe London School of Phonology was headed by Prof. Daniel Jones and represents the physical conception of the phoneme.In his monograph "The Phoneme: its nature and use" Jones writes that the idea of the phoneme was first introduced to him in 1911 by Prof Scerba in Leningrad. He sticks to the original definition of the phoneme mentalistic but he finds it inconvenient for practical purposes. His definition of a phoneme is the following: the phoneme is a family of sounds in a given language which are related in character and are used in such a way that no one member ever occurs in a word in the same context value as any other member.In his "An Outline of English Phonetics" he gives a similar definition: a phoneme is a family of sounds consisting of an important sound of the language together with other related sounds which take place in particular sound-sequences or under particular conditions of length or stress. He emphasizes that the fact that different members of the same phoneme are mutually exclusive. For example, the [k] which is used in keep cannot be used in call where we use a labialized [k].His theory of a phoneme may be so-called "atomistic". He breaks up the phoneme into atoms and considers different features of phonemes as independent phenomena. He speaks of different qualities of the same phoneme as "phones", a number of which forms the corresponding phoneme. He also speaks of different degrees of length as "chrones" which are combined into "chronemes" that are distinctive in a language, for example, the long and the short chronemes in English. In the same way he distinguishes tones and tonemes in tone languages and strones and stronemes (for different degrees of stress).Length and tone have no importance without other sound features. They exist only in phonemes and all their characteristic features taken together make up a phoneme which is linguistically distinctive.According to Jones, the problem of phonemes is connected with philosophy, so that a linguist cannot cope with it. His object is to give the phoneme a purely practical application: it is useful in teaching languages in creating phonetic transcribed.The phoneme theory in America was headed by Edward Sepir and Leonard Bloomfield. It is characterized as structuralism. An American structuralism is based on behaviourism. The linguistic processes of the mind are unobservable. Our only information about the mind is derived from the behavior of the individual whom it inhabits. Another representative of this trend asserts: "Pattern is habit, structure is the behavior pattern is langue, structure is parole, pattern is culture, structure, is a behavioral manifestation of culture".Leonard Bloomfiled defines the phoneme as the minimum unit of distinctive sound-feature, but W.F. Twaddell defines it as an abstractional fiction.
переводится, пожалуйста, подождите..
Результаты (английский) 2:[копия]
Скопировано!
Phonological School, the London of The of The School, the London of phonology WAS headed by Prof. Of Jones and represents by Daniel the Physical conception of the Phoneme. With In a His Monograph "of The Phoneme: its' nature and use" of Jones writes That the: idea of the Phoneme WAS HIM to first Introduced in 1911 by Prof Scerba in Leningrad. He sticks to the original mentalistic definition of the phoneme but he finds it inconvenient for practical purposes. His definition of a phoneme is the following : phoneme is a family of sounds in a given language which are related in character and are used in such a way that no one member ever occurs in a word in the same phonetic context as any other member. in his "an Outline of English Phonetics " he gives a similar definition: a phoneme is a family of sounds consisting of an important sound of the language together with other related sounds which take place in particular sound-sequences or under particular conditions of length or stress. He emphasizes the fact that different members of the same phoneme are mutually exclusive. Example For, the [the k] the which is USED in the keep the BE USED CAN not call in where clause we use a labialized [the k]. A His theory of a Phoneme may the BE Called "atomistic". He breaks up the phoneme into atoms and considers different features of phonemes as independent phenomena. He speaks of different qualities of the same phoneme as "phones", a number of which forms the corresponding phoneme. He also speaks of different degrees of length as "chrones" which are combined into "chronemes" that are distinctive in a language, for example, the long and the short chronemes in English. The Same way with In he distinguishes tones and tonemes in tone languages ​​and strones and stronemes (for Different degrees of stress). The Length and have the no tone then importance OTHER without sound features. The exist only in for They phonemes and all Their Characteristic features taken-together the make up closeup Phoneme the which is a linguistically Distinctive. According to of Jones, the problem of phonemes is the connected with philosophy, That a linguist on SO CAN COPE not with IT. The object is to a His give the Phoneme a Purely Practical application: IT is Useful in teaching languages, in Creating Company Phonetic transcription. Of The Phoneme theory in America headed by WAS sepir of Edward and of Leonard of Bloomfield. It is characterized as structuralism. An American structuralism is based on behaviourism. The linguistic processes of the mind are unobservable . Our only information about the mind is derived from the behavior of the individual whom it inhabits. For Another Representative of the this Trend hit asserts: "Pattern A is habit, structure is behavior, the pattern is langue, structure is parole, the pattern is culture, structure is behavioral Manifestation of culture". Of Leonard Bloomfiled DEFINES the Phoneme as with minimum unit of Distinctive sound-a feature, but WF Twaddell defines it as an abstractional fiction.
















переводится, пожалуйста, подождите..
Результаты (английский) 3:[копия]
Скопировано!
the london real schoolthe london school of Phonology was headed by prof. daniel jones and represents the physical conception of the conventions.in the biological features of the Phoneme: its nature and use "jones writes that the idea of the conventions was first introduced to him in 1911 by prof Scerba in leningrad. he sticks to the original mentalistic definition of the conventions, but he finds it too much for practical purposes. his definition of a conventions is the following: conventions is a family of sounds in a given language which are related in character and are used in such a way that no one but your letter in a word in the same phonetic context as any other member.in his "an outline of english Phonetics" he gives a similar definition: a conventions is a family of sounds the voice of an important sound of the language together with other related sounds which take place in particular sound - sequences or under particular conditions of length or stress. he emphasizes the fact that different members of the spoken languages are mutually exclusive. for example, the [k] which is used in window cannot be used in call where we use a labialized [k].his theory of a conventions may be called "atomistic". he breaks up the conventions into atoms and considers different features of over such as independent in. he speaks of different qualities of the spoken languages as "phones", a number of which forms the corresponding conventions. he also speaks of different degrees of length as the "chrones" which are combined into "chronemes" that are in english), for example, the long and the short chronemes in english. in the same way he distinguishes tones and tonemes in that english and strones and stronemes (for different degrees of stress).length and speech have no importance to a sound features. they exist only in over such and all their characteristic features taken together make up a conventions which is linguistically).according to jones, the problem of over such is connected with culture, so that a at cannot cope with it. his object is to give the conventions (a purely practical application, it is useful in teaching languages in creating words correctly.the conventions theory in america was headed by edward Sepir and leonard it. it is characterized as structuralism. an american structuralism is based on behaviourism. the linguistic processes of the mind are unobservable. the information about the mind is derived from the behavior of the individual whom it inhabits. another representative of this trend asserts: "pattern is habit, structure and behavior, the pattern is a piece, the structure is words, pattern in the culture, the structure is behavioral manifestation of culture".leonard Bloomfiled defines the conventions) as minimum unit of main feature, but W.F. Twaddell defines it as an abstractional fiction.
переводится, пожалуйста, подождите..
 
Другие языки
Поддержка инструмент перевода: Клингонский (pIqaD), Определить язык, азербайджанский, албанский, амхарский, английский, арабский, армянский, африкаанс, баскский, белорусский, бенгальский, бирманский, болгарский, боснийский, валлийский, венгерский, вьетнамский, гавайский, галисийский, греческий, грузинский, гуджарати, датский, зулу, иврит, игбо, идиш, индонезийский, ирландский, исландский, испанский, итальянский, йоруба, казахский, каннада, каталанский, киргизский, китайский, китайский традиционный, корейский, корсиканский, креольский (Гаити), курманджи, кхмерский, кхоса, лаосский, латинский, латышский, литовский, люксембургский, македонский, малагасийский, малайский, малаялам, мальтийский, маори, маратхи, монгольский, немецкий, непальский, нидерландский, норвежский, ория, панджаби, персидский, польский, португальский, пушту, руанда, румынский, русский, самоанский, себуанский, сербский, сесото, сингальский, синдхи, словацкий, словенский, сомалийский, суахили, суданский, таджикский, тайский, тамильский, татарский, телугу, турецкий, туркменский, узбекский, уйгурский, украинский, урду, филиппинский, финский, французский, фризский, хауса, хинди, хмонг, хорватский, чева, чешский, шведский, шона, шотландский (гэльский), эсперанто, эстонский, яванский, японский, Язык перевода.

Copyright ©2025 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: