1. Наказание должны быть пропорцион

1. Наказание должны быть пропорционально преступлению: убийства и особо тяжкие преступления должны, без сомнения, наказываться смертью – это справедливо.


2. Только страх перед неотвратимой смертью может остановить преступника: смертная казнь – замечательный социальный регулятор преступности, который держит правонарушителей в страхе и обеспечивает безопасность законопослушных граждан.


3. Смертная казнь – это важная очистительная процедура для любого общества - очистка от зла и его носителей, которая носит огромный нравственный, почти мистический характер.


4. Благодаря смертной казни экономятся огромные деньги, которые в ином случае тратятся на содержание преступников при пожизненном заключении: несправедливо тратить деньги на содержание убийц и маньяков, которые не достойны жизни.


5. Только смертная казнь преступника может стать хотя бы частичной компенсацией потери для близких жертвы - мертвого не воскресить, но и преступника оставлять в живых нельзя: нельзя прощать убийства и особо тяжкие преступления.


6. Во многих странах, где смертная казнь сохранена, большинство населения выступает в поддержку этого инструмента борьбы с преступностью, нельзя идти против воли народа, это недемократично.


7. Так называемые «гуманистические ценности», «европейские ценности», абстрактные «универсальные идеи прав человека» и т.п., так же как и отказ от смертной казни - неприменимы в условиях многих стран даже самой Европы, не говоря уже о странах Азии, Африки и других континентов.


8. Если уж в такой стране, как США, которая пытается навязывать свои стандарты прав граждан чуть ли не всему миру, есть смертная казнь, - почему другие страны должны отказываться от ее применения?


9. Отмена смертной казни выгодна «западным» и «европейским» политикам, как элемент усиления преступности, а следовательно - дестабилизации внутренней ситуации в других странах с целью дальнейшего влияния на внутриполитическую жизнь этих стран.


10. Государство должно обладать правом на устранение антисоциальных элементов (убийц, маньяков и т.д.) и именно государство должно решать, кто является таким элементом, иначе это государство перестает быть государством, и оно не будет достойно уважения.


11. Борьба со злом – это необходимость, которая стоит отдельных и случайных жертв со стороны невиновных: вероятность гибели невиновных не должна быть основанием для препятствования справедливому правосудию, возмездию и устрашению негодяев.


12. Смертная казнь очень древний и прекрасно зарекомендовавший себя способ борьбы со злом и преступностью: многие века, многие страны использовали этот способ в борьбе за порядок и безопасность, более того, для многих стран она является традиционным и важным элементом культуры.


13. Будучи осужденным на пожизненное заключение, человек вынужден в течение десятилетий испытывать страдания от жутких условий содержания и невозможности выйти на свободу: смертная казнь избавляет его от этих мучений и является в этом смысле образцом гуманного отношения к преступникам

Результаты (английский) 1:

1. the penalty shall be proportionate to the crime: murder and particularly grave crimes should without a doubt be punished by death is true.2. Only the fear of imminent death can stop the perpetrator: the death penalty is a wonderful social crime regulator that keeps offenders in fear and ensures the safety of law-abiding citizens.3. the death penalty is an important procedure for cleaning any society-the purification from evil and its media, which is a huge moral, almost mystical in nature.4. with the death penalty saves a huge amount of money otherwise spent on content of criminals with life imprisonment: unfair to spend money on content of murderers and maniacs who are not worthy of life.5. Only the death penalty an offender can become at least partial compensation for loss of the victim's relatives-dead not resurrect, but the offender to leave alive, you can't: you cannot condone murder and particularly grave crimes.6. In many countries where the death penalty is retained, the majority of the population supports this tool to combat crime, we cannot go against the will of the people, it is undemocratic.7. The so-called "humanistic values", "European values", abstract universal ideas of human rights ", etc., as well as the rejection of the death penalty did not apply in many countries even Europe itself, not to mention the countries in Asia, Africa and other continents.8. If in a country like the United States, which is trying to impose its standards on the rights of citizens almost around the world, the death penalty, why other countries should abandon its applications?9. The abolition of the death penalty is beneficial to Western and European politicians, as an element of strengthening the crime, and thus destabilizing the internal situation in other countries with a view to further influence on the internal political life of those countries.10. the State should have the right to eliminate antisocial elements (murderers, maniacs, etc.) and it is the State that should decide who is such an element, otherwise the State ceases to be a State, and it will not be worthy of respect.11. Fight against evil is a necessity, which stands separate and random victims from the innocent: the probability of the death of the innocent should not be grounds for obstruction of equitable justice, retribution and intimidate the villains.12. the death penalty is very ancient and well proven way to deal with evil and crime: for centuries, many countries used this way in the struggle for order and security, indeed, for many countries, it is a traditional and essential element of the culture.13. Being convicted to life imprisonment, for decades people have to suffer from terrible conditions and inability to escape to freedom: the death penalty saves him from this torment and it is in this sense a model humane treatment of criminals

Результаты (английский) 2:

1. The punishment should be proportionate to the crime: murder and particularly serious crimes should, without doubt, be punished with death - this is true. 2. Only the fear of imminent death can stop the perpetrator: the death penalty - a great social control of crime, which holds offenders at bay and ensures the safety of law-abiding citizens. 3. The death penalty - an important cleansing procedure for any society - removal of evil and its speakers, which is a huge moral, almost mystical character. 4. Due to the death penalty saves a lot of money that otherwise is spent on the maintenance of criminals with life imprisonment: unfair to spend money on content of murderers and maniacs who are not worthy of life. 5. Only the death of the criminal penalty may be at least partially compensated for the loss of the victim's family - not resurrect the dead, but the offender can not be kept alive: it is impossible to forgive the murder and particularly grave crimes. 6. In many countries where the death penalty is maintained, the majority of the population is in favor of this tool to combat crime, we can not go against the will of the people is not democratic. 7. So-called "humanistic values", "European values", abstract "idea of universal human rights" and the like, as well as the abolition of the death penalty - not applicable in the circumstances of many countries, even within Europe, not to mention Asia, Africa and other continents. 8. If we are in a country like the United States, which is trying to impose its own standards for the rights of citizens almost all over the world, there is the death penalty, - why other countries should abandon the use of? 9. Abolition of the death penalty is beneficial "Western" and "European" policies, as part of the gain of crime, and therefore - the destabilization of the internal situation in other countries in order to further influence on the internal political life of these countries. 10. The state should have the right to the elimination of anti-social elements (murderers, killers, etc.) and the state should decide who is such an element, or a state ceases to be a state, and it will not be worthy of respect. 11. The struggle against evil - it is a necessity, which is separate and random victims on the part of the innocent: the probability of death of innocent people should not be a reason for preventing fair justice, retribution and intimidation villains. 12. The death penalty is a very old and well-established way to deal with evil and crime: for many centuries, many countries have used this method in the struggle for order and security, in fact, in many countries it is a traditional and important part of culture. 13. Being sentenced to life imprisonment, a person is forced for decades to suffer from terrible conditions and the inability to escape to freedom: the death penalty saves him from this suffering and is in this sense a model of humane treatment of criminals

Результаты (английский) 3:

1. the punishment must be proportionate to the crime: the murder and particularly serious crimes should, without doubt, be punished to death is fair.2. only the fear of imminent death, the death penalty can stop the crime is a social regulator, which keeps the offenders in fear and ensures the safety of law-abiding citizens.3. the death penalty is an important this cleansing procedure for any society - clean from evil and his hosts, which is a huge moral, almost mystical in nature.4. because of the death penalty экономятся vast amounts of money that might otherwise have spent on the offenders with life imprisonment: wrong to spend money for the maintenance of the murderers and criminals who are not worthy of life.5. only the death penalty criminal can be at least partial compensation for the loss of loved ones dead dead, but a spare can not forgive murder and particularly serious crimes.6. in many countries where the death penalty is maintained, the majority of the population supports the instrument to combat crime, cannot go against the will of the people, it is not democratic.7. the so-called "humanistic value", "european values", the abstract "general ideas of human rights" and the like, as well as the rejection of the death penalty is not applicable in the context of many countries, even the most of europe, not to mention the countries of asia, africa and other continents.8. if in a country like the us, which is trying to impose their standards on the rights of the citizens, almost all over the world, have the death penalty, why other countries should abandon its use?9. the abolition of the death penalty, if the "western" and "европейским» politicians as part of the increase in crime, thus destabilizing the internal situation in other countries, with a view to further influence the domestic policies of these countries.10. the state should have the right to eliminate antisocial elements (murderers, criminals, etc.) and that the state should decide who is such an element, if that state has ceased to be a state, and it will not be worthy of respect.11. the struggle against evil is necessary, which should be selected and random victims with the innocent: the probability of the loss of the innocent should not be used to impede fair justice, vengeance and terrorizing the people.12. the death penalty is a very ancient and beautiful the way to fight with evil and crime: a many century, many countries have used this way in the struggle for order and security, moreover, for many countries, it is a traditional and important part of the culture.13. as осужденны