В древние времена люди для передачи

В древние времена люди для передачи информации использовали наскальную живопись. Сегодня же рисунки на стенах домов отталкивают жителей городов, что вызывает конфликты и недопонимания между художниками и общественностью.
Как ни странно, обе стороны можно понять. Художники граффити пытаются выразить себя, показывая свои работы всему городу. А общество пытается сохранить первозданный облик города и защитить архитектурные постройки. Граффити,сравнимые с работами современных художников, имеют право на существование, но, как мне кажется, лучше найти способ не портить имущество и архитектуру.
Действительно, с одной стороны, зачем граффитистам портить городское имущество, если они спокойно могут творить на бумаге, картоне холсте и др. Тем более на улице работать достаточно не комфортно.
С другой стороны, зачем им тратить деньги на дорогостоящие материалы, если можно творить на любой городской стене обычной краской из баллончика. Тем более в современных городах довольно много серых и неприглядных фасадов домов, гаражей и заброшенных зданий.
Из всего этого следует, как мне кажется, что обоим сторонам конфликта следует пойти на компромисс: почему бы городским властям не выделить территорию с ненужными и малоиспользуемыми зданиями, помещениями и поверхностями, и не позволить художникам работать именно там? Кроме того, это может позволить заработать деньги, а не расходовать бюджет на постоянную перекраску стен. Просто представьте, что власти, сдавая площаи и стены в аренду будут пополнять бюджет, а художники, в свою очередь устраивающие там выставки, и сами смогут неплохо заработать.

Результаты (английский) 1:

In ancient times, people used to pass information to rock art. Also today, the drawings on the walls of houses in cities that repel causes conflicts and misunderstandings between artists and the public.Oddly enough, both parties can understand. Graffiti artists are trying to express themselves by showing their works around the city. And the company is trying to preserve the original appearance of the city and protect architectural structures. Graffiti, comparable to the works of contemporary artists, have the right to exist, but as I see it, it is better to find a way to not deface property and architecture.Indeed, on the one hand, why graffitistam spoil municipal property if they safely can work on paper, cardboard, canvas, etc. The more outside work is not comfortable. On the other hand, why should they spend money on expensive materials, if you can work on any normal city wall paint from spray cans. Especially in modern cities are pretty much grey and unsightly facades of houses, garages and abandoned buildings.From all this it should be, it seems to me that both parties to the conflict should compromise: why city authorities do not provide the territory with unnecessary and use buildings, premises and surfaces, and does not allow artists to work there? In addition, this may allow to make money and not to spend the budget for constant repainting the walls. Just imagine that power, by ploŝai and walls for rent will top up the budget, and artists, in turn, organize events and exhibitions there themselves will be able to earn good money.

Результаты (английский) 2:

In ancient times, people used to transmit information rock painting. Today, the drawings on the walls repel urban residents, causing conflicts and misunderstandings between artists and the public.
Ironically, both sides can understand. Graffiti artists are trying to express themselves, showing their works throughout the city. A society is trying to keep the original appearance of the city and to protect the architectural buildings. Graffiti comparable with the works of contemporary artists have the right to exist, but it seems to me, it is better to find a way not to destroy property and architecture.
Indeed, on the one hand, why spoil graffiti urban property if they can safely do on paper, cardboard canvas and others. Especially on the street do not work quite comfortable.
On the other hand, why would they spend money on expensive materials, if you can do any normal city wall paint from a container. Especially in modern cities quite a lot of gray and unsightly facades of houses, garages and abandoned buildings.
It follows from this, it seems to me that both sides of the conflict should be a compromise: why the city authorities do not allocate territory with unnecessary and underutilized buildings, premises and surfaces, and do not allow artists to work there? In addition, it may allow to make money, not spend the budget on a constant repainting walls. Just imagine that the authorities, handing ploschat walls and rent will replenish the budget, and artists, in turn arranges exhibitions themselves will be able to earn good money.

Результаты (английский) 3:

In ancient times people to transfer information used prehistoric. Today, paintings on the walls houses discourages the inhabitants of cities,That causes conflicts and misunderstandings between artists and the general public.
how strange, both sides can be to understand. Graffiti artists are trying to express themselves, showing their work throughout the city.And that the society is trying to preserve pristine town and protect architectural buildings. Graffiti,comparable with the works of contemporary artists, have the right to existence, but also, it seems to me,It is best to find a way do not mutilate property and architecture.
indeed, on the one hand, why граффитистам mutilate urban property, if they quietly can do on paper, cardboard canvas and more.The more on the street to work enough is not comfortable.
ON the other hand, why would they spend money on expensive materials, if you can do at any city wall normal paint from the bottle.All the more so in modern cities quite a few gray and unsightly facades houses, garages, and abandoned buildings.
from all of this it should be noted, as it seems to me that both parties to the conflict should be willing to compromise.Why would urban authorities not to allocate the territory with unnecessary and малоиспользуемыми buildings, premises and surfaces, and do not allow artists to work it is there? In addition,This may make it possible to earn money, and not to spend the budget on the constant repainting the walls. Just imagine that the authorities, what happens when I give площаи and the walls in the rental will replenish the budget, and artists,In turn, convince the exhibition, and they themselves will be able to earn good.