Housing Almost everybody in Britain

Housing

Almost everybody in Britain dreams of living in a detached house; that is, a house which is a separate building. The saying, 'An Englishman's - home is his castle' is well-known. It illustrates the desire for privacy and the importance attached to ownership which seem to be at the heart of the British attitude to housing.

Houses, not flats

A large, detached house not only ensures privacy. It is also a status symbol. At the extreme end of the scale there is the aristocratic 'stately home' set in acres of garden. Of course, such a house is an unrealistic dream for most people. But even a small detached house, surrounded by garden, gives the required suggestion of rural life which is dear to the hearts of many British people. Most people would be happy to live in a cottage, and if this is a thatched cottage, reminiscent of a pre-industrial age, so much the better.

Most people try to avoid living in blocks of flats (what the Americans call 'apartment blocks'). Flats, thev feci, provide the least amount of privacy. With a few exceptions, mostly in ccftain locations in central London, Hats are the cheapest kind of home. The people who live in them are those who cannot afford to live anywhere else.

The dislike of living in flats is very strong- In the 1950s millions of poorer people lived in old, cold, uncomfortable nineteenth century houses, often with only an outside toilet and no bathroom. During the next twenty years many of them were given smart new 'high rise' blocks of flats to live in which, with central heating and bathrooms, were much more comfortable and were surrounded by grassy open spaces. But people hated their new homes. They said they felt cut off from the world all those floors up. They missed the neigh-bourliness. They couldn't keep a watchful eye on their children playing down there in those lovely green spaces. The new high-rise blocks quickly deteriorated. The lifts broke down. The lights in the corridors didn't work. Windows got broken and were not repaired. There was graffiti all over the walls.
In theory (and except for the difficulty with supervising children), there is no objective reason why these high-rise blocks (also known as 'tower blocks') could not have been a success. In other countries millions of people live reasonably happily in flats. But in Britain they were a failure because they do not suit British attitudes. The failure has been generally recognized for several years now. No more high-rises are being built. At the present time, only 4% of the population live in one. Only 20% of the country's households live in fiats of any kind.

Результаты (английский) 1:

Housing Almost everybody in Britain dreams of living in a detached house; that is, a house which is a separate building. The saying, ' An Englishman's-home is his castle ' is well-known. It illustrates the desire for privacy and the importance attached to ownership which seem to be at the heart of the British attitude to housing.Houses, not flatsA large, detached house not only ensures privacy. It is also a status symbol. At the extreme end of the scale there is the aristocratic ' stately home ' set in acres of garden. Of course, such a house is an unrealistic dream for most people. But even a small detached house, surrounded by garden, gives the required suggestion of rural life which is dear to the hearts of many British people. Most people would be happy to live in a cottage, and if this is a thatched cottage, reminiscent of a pre-industrial age, so much the better.Most people try to avoid living in blocks of flats (what the Americans call ' apartment blocks '). Flats, thev feci, provide the least amount of privacy. With a few exceptions, mostly in ccftain locations in central London, Hats are the cheapest kind of home. The people who live in them are those who cannot for the Roma community to live anywhere else.The dislike of living in flats is very strong In the 1950s millions of poorer people lived in the old, cold, uncomfortable nineteenth century houses, often with only an outside toilet and no bathroom. During the next twenty years many of them were given new ' smart ' high rise blocks of flats to live in which, with central heating and bathrooms, were much more comfortable and were surrounded by grassy open spaces. But people hated their new homes. They said they felt cut off from the world all those floors up. They missed the neigh-bourliness. They couldn't keep a watchful eye on their children playing down there in those lovely green spaces. The new high-rise blocks quickly deteriorated. The lifts broke down. The lights in the corridors didn't work. Windows got broken and were not repaired. There was graffiti all over the walls.In theory (and except for the difficulty with supervising children), there is no objective reason why these high-rise blocks (also known as ' tower blocks ') could not have been a success. In other countries, millions of people live reasonably happily in flats. But in Britain they were a failure because they do not suit the British attitudes. The failure has been generally recognized for several years now. No more high rises are being built. At the present time, only 4% of the population live in one. Only 20% of the country's households live in fiats of any kind.

Результаты (английский) 2:

Housing Almost everybody in Britain dreams of living in a detached house; that is, a house which is a separate building. The saying, 'An Englishman's - home is his castle' is well-known. Illustrates the desire It for privacy and the importance attached to ownership which seem to be at the heart of the British attitude to housing. Houses, flats not A large, detached house not only ensures privacy. It is also a status symbol. At the extreme end of the scale there is the aristocratic 'stately home' set in acres of garden. Of course, such a house is an unrealistic dream for most people. But even a small detached house, surrounded by garden, gives the required suggestion of rural life which is dear to the hearts of many British people. Most people would be happy to live in a cottage, and if this is a thatched cottage, reminiscent of a pre-industrial age, so much the better. Most people try to avoid living in blocks of flats (what the Americans call 'apartment blocks '). Flats, thev feci, provide the least amount of privacy. With a few exceptions, mostly in ccftain locations in central London, Hats are the cheapest kind of home. The people who live in them are those who can not afford to live anywhere else. The dislike of living in flats is very strong- In the 1950s millions of poorer people lived in old, cold, uncomfortable nineteenth century houses, often with only an outside toilet and no bathroom. During the next twenty years many of them were given smart new 'high rise' blocks of flats to live in which, with central heating and bathrooms, were much more comfortable and were surrounded by grassy open spaces. But people hated their new homes. They said they felt cut off from the world all those floors up. They missed the neigh-bourliness. They could not keep a watchful eye on their children playing down there in those lovely green spaces. The new high-rise blocks quickly deteriorated. The lifts broke down. The lights in the corridors did not work. Windows got broken and were not repaired. Was graffiti all There over the walls. In theory (and except for the difficulty with supervising children), there is no objective reason why these high-rise blocks (also known as 'tower blocks') could not have been a success. In other countries millions of people live reasonably happily in flats. But in Britain they were a failure because they do not suit British attitudes. The failure has been generally recognized for several years now. No more high-rises are being built. At the present time, only 4% of the population live in one. Only 20% of the country's households live in fiats of any kind.

Результаты (английский) 3:

housing

almost everybody in britain dreams of living in a detached house; that is, a house which is a separate building. the saying, "an englishman's home is his castle" is well known. it illustrates the desire for privacy and the importance attached to ownership which seem to be at the heart of the british people to housing.



houses, not by a largedetached house not only ensures privacy. it is also a status symbol. at the extreme end of the scale there is the 'home' stately) located in the beautiful garden. of course, such a house is an unrealistic dream for most people. but even a small detached house, surrounded by beautiful, gives the required suggestion of rural life which is dear to the hearts of many british people.most people would be happy to live in a cottage, and if this is a thatched cottage, with of a pre industrial age, so much the better.

most people try to avoid living in blocks of by (what the americans call "apartment blocks). Flats, thev feci, provide the least amount of privacy. with a few exceptions, as in ccftain locations in central london.hats are the leise kind of home. the people who live in them are those who cannot afford to live anywhere else.

the dislike of living in by is very strong in the 1950s millions of poorer people lived in old, cold, hard, or other words, often with only an outside toilet and a bathroom.during the next twenty years many of them were given a 'smart' blocks of high rise by to live in which, with central heating and bathrooms, was much more comfortable and were surrounded by grassy open hotel. but people hated their new homes. they said they felt cut off from the world all those floors up. they missed the neigh - bourliness.they couldn 't keep a watchful eye on their children playing down there in those lovely green hotel. the new high rise blocks quickly deteriorated. the lifts broke down. the lights in the key didn't work. windows got broken and were not repaired. there was graffiti all over the walls.
in theory (and except for the price with supervising children)there is no objective reason why these high rise blocks (also known as' tower blocks') could not have been a success. in other countries (in millions of people live happily by. but in britain they were a failure because they do not suit british attitudes. the failure has been generally recognized for several years now. no more high rises are being built. at the present time.only 4% of the population live in one. only 20% of the country's households live in fiats of any kind.