В современном мире люди,если они за

В современном мире люди,если они захотят увидеть диких животных, то они могут сходить в зоопарк.Зоопарки сосредоточены на сохранении вида животных и образовании общественности.Многие критики предполагают,что идея зоопарка вредна для причины сохранения животных.
Я считаю, что животным лучше жить на воле, потому-что так они могут свободно передвигаться и наслаждаться природой. Минусами зоопарков являются, во-первых, тюремный приговор на всю жизнь. У животных от скуки развивается стереотипное поведение - зоохозис. Они трясут головой, бродят по клетке, кусают себя.Во-вторых, ужасная транспортировка. Погрузка и перевозка животных в зоопарки осуществляется крайне жестокими способами. Если животное не подчиняется, то его избивают. В-третьих, неестественные условия содержания. Белым медведям, слонам и тюленям не комфортно находиться в нашем умеренном климате.
Тем не менее, следует взглянуть на эту проблему с другой стороны. Надо признать, что зоопарки являются хорошим местом для сохранения вымирающих видов животных. Но это всего капля в море по сравнению с отрицательными чертами зоопарков. Большинство зоопарков нуждаются в средствах для содержания животных, и будет лучше, чтобы эти средства были потрачены на отмену браконьерства и охоты, которые и создают эти вымирающие виды.
Подводя итог, можно сказать, что зоопарк не является лучшим местом для животных. Природа создала их в естественной среде обитания, там где они и должны жить.

Результаты (английский) 1:

In the modern world people, if they want to see wild animals, then they can go to the Zoo. Zoos focus on preserving species and public education. many critics suggest that the idea of the reasons for the persistence of harmful for Zoo animals.I believe that it is better to live animals in the wild, because they can move freely and enjoy nature. Cons of zoos are, first, the prison sentence for life. In the animals of boredom is a stereotypical behavior-zoohozis. They have shaken his head, wandering around the cage, bitten yourself. Second, horrible handling. Loading and transportation of animals in zoos are extremely violent ways. If the animal does not obey, his beat. Thirdly, unnatural conditions. Polar bears, elephants and seals are not comfortable staying in our temperate climate.However, you should take a look at this problem from another angle. It must be admitted that zoos are a good place to save the endangered species. But this is just a drop in the bucket compared with negative traits of zoos. Most zoos need to contain the animals, and it is better that these funds were spent on the abolition of hunting and poaching, which create these endangered species.In summary, the Zoo is not the best place for animals. Nature created them in their natural habitat where they should live.

Результаты (английский) 2:

In today's world, people, if they want to see wild animals, then they can go to the zoopark.Zooparki focused on maintaining the species and the formation of obschestvennosti.Mnogie critics suggest that the idea of the zoo is harmful for reasons of conservation of animals.
I believe that the animal is better to live on will, therefore, that so they can move freely and enjoy nature. Outs zoos are, firstly, a prison sentence for life. The animals of boredom develops stereotyped behavior - zoohozis. They shake their heads, wandering around the cage, bite sebya.Vo Second, terrible transportation. Loading and transportation of animals in zoos performed extremely brutal ways. If the animal does not obey, then beat him. Thirdly, unnatural conditions. Polar bears, elephants and seals not be comfortable in our temperate climate.
However, you should look at this problem from the other side. I must admit that zoos are a good place to save the endangered species. But this is just a drop in the bucket compared to the negative traits of zoos. Most zoos require means for the animals, and it would be better that these funds were spent on the abolition of poaching and hunting, which create these endangered species.
In summary, we can say that the zoo is not a better place for animals. Nature created them in their natural habitat, where they should live.

Результаты (английский) 3:

In the modern world, people,if they want to see wild animals, they can go to the zoo.Zoos are focused on maintaining the animals and public education.Many critics assume,The idea that the zoo which are harmful to the causes of the animals.
I believe that animals is better to live in the will, because the so they can move freely and enjoy nature. Cons zoos are, first,Prison sentence for the rest of their lives. In animals of boredom is stereotyped behavior - зоохозис. They are shaking your head, roaming on square, biting themselves.Secondly, the terrible transportation.Loading and transportation of live animals in zoos is extremely brutal ways. If the animal is not subordinate to, his being beaten. Thirdly, unnatural conditions of detention. White p.,Shoot him and which meet not comfortable stay in our moderate climate.
you should, however, look at this issue on the other side. It must be recognized,That zoos are a good place to save the endangered species of animals. But it is just a drop in the sea, compared with a negative features zoos.Most zoos need to be means for content of animals, and will be better, so that the money had been spent on the abolition poaching and hunting, which create these endangered species;.
In summary,You can say that the zoo is not the best place for the animals. The nature has created them in their natural habitat, where they are and must be able to live.