отсутствие единой базы классификаци

отсутствие единой базы классификации; неясность лексического объема однозначных эквивалентов, поскольку они могут включать в себя более одной лексемы. Алексеева также предлагает изучить соотношение параметра однозначности соответствий, и типа текста, в котором они встречаются. Тип текста, по ее предположению, может определять степень свободы переводчика в выборе соответствия. На материале примеров, обсуждаемых Комиссаровым, она утверждает, что однозначные эквиваленты могут быть языковыми, а могут быть речевыми.
Критики указывали на чрезмерно нормативный характер теории Рецкера. Поэтому в последующих своих публикациях Рецкер неоднократно подчеркивает творческий характер переводческой деятельности.

Результаты (английский) 1:

the lack of a unified base of classification; lexical ambiguity volume clear equivalents because they may include more than one token. Alexeyev also proposes to study the correlation of parameter correspondence is unambiguous, and type text in which they appear. Type the text on her assumption, can determine the degree of freedom of the translator in the choice of compliance. On the basis of the examples discussed Komissarov, she maintains that unambiguous equivalents may be language-specific, and can be spoken.Critics point to the excessive normative character of the theory of Reckera. So in subsequent publications Recker repeatedly emphasizes the creative nature of translation activities.

Результаты (английский) 2:

the absence of a unified database of classification; lexical ambiguity volume unequivocal equivalents, as they may include more than one token. Alexeyev also offers the option to explore the relationship-one correspondence, and the type of text in which they occur. Type the text, in its assumption, may determine the degree of freedom in the choice of compliance translator. For examples of materials discussed Komissarov, she argues that the unambiguous language equivalents may be or may be speech.
Critics have pointed to the excessively normative Retskera theory. Therefore, in his subsequent publications Retsker repeatedly emphasizes the creative character of translation.

Результаты (английский) 3:

the lack of a unified base of classification; uncertainty into volume definitive equivalents because they can include more than one in. the 1994 amendment to the regulations was unlawful also offers study the uniqueness of correspondence, and the type of text, in which they occur. text type, she suggests, may determine the degree of freedom in the choice of the translator. the material examples discussed комиссаровым, she argues that the unique equivalents can be language, and may be speaking.critics pointed out that the theory of рецкера overly prescriptive in nature. however, in subsequent publications рецкер repeatedly stresses the creative nature of translation activities.