Financial CostsThe death penalty is

Financial Costs
The death penalty is not now, nor has it ever been, a more economical alternative to life imprisonment. A murder trial normally takes much longer when the death penalty is at issue than when it is not. Litigation costs – including the time of judges, prosecutors, public defenders, and court reporters, and the high costs of briefs – are all borne by the taxpayer.

Пришло время отменить смертную казнь. С каждым годом это становится все более очевидным. Опыт всех стран показыва­ет, что смертная казнь приводит к ожесточению в обществе. В ряде стран смертные приговоры применяются в основном к представителям неимущих слоев населения либо расовых или этнических меньшинств.

В некоторых странах смертная казнь считается мерой, без которой невозможно остановить распространение наркотиков, ликвидировать политический терроризм, экономическую кор­рупцию или искоренить супружескую неверность. Однако нет никаких доказательств, что ее применение способно снизить уровень преступности или политического насилия. Смертную казнь часто используют как средство политических репрессий, а смертные приговоры выносятся и привидятся в исполнение произвольно.

Оправдывая смертную казнь, чаще всего говорят, что она необходима, па крайней мере временно, для блага общества.

Одаако имеет ли государство право лишать человека жизни?

Смертная казнь — это предумышленное и хладнокровное убийство человека государством. Само существование этой меры нагсазания является попранием основных прав человека: меж­дународное право запрещает жестокие, негуманные или унижа­ющие человека наказания.

Многовековой опыт применения высшей меры наказания и научные исследования о взаимосвязи смертной казни и уровня преступности не дали убедительных доказательств, что смертная казнь способна эффективно защитить общество от преступ­ности или способствовать правосудию. Ни одна система уголов­ной юстиции не доказала свою способность последовательно и справедливо решать, кто должен жить и кто — умереть. Некото­рым удается избежать смертной казни с помощью квалифици­рованных защитников; другим — потому что их судят мягко­сердечные судьи или присяжные; третьим помогают их полити­ческие связи или положение в обществе. Однако существует определенный процент судебных ошибок, по­следствия которых особенно трагичны при приведении смертно­го приговора в исполнение.

Результаты (английский) 1:

Financial CostsThe death penalty is not now, nor has it ever been, a more economical alternative to life imprisonment. A murder trial normally takes much longer when the death penalty is at issue than when it is not. Litigation costs-including the time of the judges, prosecutors, public defenders and court reporters, the high costs of briefs-are all borne by the your.The time has come to abolish the death penalty. Every year it becomes more evident. The experience of all countries shows that the death penalty leads to bitterness in the society. In a number of countries the death penalty is applied mainly to the poor or racial or ethnic minorities.In some countries, the death penalty is considered the measure, without which it is impossible to stop the spread of drugs, elimination of political terrorism, economic corruption or eliminate infidelity. However, there is no evidence that it can reduce crime or political violence. The death penalty is often used as a means of political repression and the death penalty and execution of arbitrary prividâtsâ.Justifying the death penalty most often say that PA is required at least temporarily, for the good of society.Odaako does a State the right to deprive a person of life?The death penalty is premeditated and cold-blooded killing of a human being by the State. The very existence of this nagsazaniâ violates fundamental human rights: international law prohibits cruel, inhumane or degrading human punishment.The centuries-old experience in the application of capital punishment and the research on the relationship between the death penalty and crime do not have conclusive evidence that the death penalty can effectively protect society from crime or to promote justice. None of the criminal justice system has not proved its ability to consistently and fairly decide who should live and who is to die. Some avoided the death penalty by a qualified defence counsel; the other is because they are judged by a judge or jury mâgkoserdečnye; to help their political ties or position in society. However, there is a certain percentage of judicial error, whose consequences are especially tragic when enforcement of the death penalty.

Результаты (английский) 2:

Financial Costs
The Death Penalty is not now, nor has it Ever Been, A more Economical alternative to Life Imprisonment. A murder trial normally takes much longer when the death penalty is at issue than when it is not. Litigation costs - including the time of judges, prosecutors, public defenders, and court reporters, and the high costs of briefs - are all borne by the taxpayer. It's time to abolish the death penalty. With each passing year it becomes more and more obvious. The experience of all countries shows that the death penalty leads to bitterness in society. In some countries, the death penalty applies mainly to the representatives of the poor, or racial or ethnic minorities. In some countries, the death penalty is considered a measure without which it is impossible to stop the spread of drugs to eliminate political terrorism, economic corruption or eradicate adultery. However, there is no evidence that its use can reduce the level of crime or political violence. The death penalty is often used as a means of political repression and the death sentences imposed and enforced arbitrarily prividitsya. Justifying the death penalty, often say that it is needed, Pa at least temporarily, for the good of society. Odaako whether the state has the right to deprive a person of life? Death penalty - a premeditated and cold-blooded killing of a human state. The very existence of this measure is nagsazaniya violation of basic human rights: international law prohibits cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment of man. Centuries of experience in the application of the death penalty and research on the relationship of the death penalty and crime rates did not give convincing evidence that the death penalty is able to effectively protect the public from crime and promote justice. None of the criminal justice system has not proven its ability to consistently and fairly decide who should live and who - to die. Some manage to avoid the death penalty by a qualified defenders; others - because they are judged hearted judge or jury; third helping their political connections or position in society. However, there is a certain percentage of miscarriages of justice, the consequences of which are especially tragic when carrying out the death sentence.

Результаты (английский) 3:

Financial costs
the death penalty is not now, very difficult has it ever been, and more necessity to imprisоnment to life. A Katatonia negotiated trial normally takes much longer when the death penalty is at issue than when it is not. Litigation costs - including the time of ICTY, prоseсutоrs, public defenders is being edited, and court nostalgic, and the high costs of briefs - are all borne by the tаxpаyer.

The time has come to abolish the death penalty. With each passing year it becomes all the more obvious. The experience of all countries most plausible explanation for these negative findings for meeting et, that the death penalty leads to bitterness in the society.