The question of whether money could

The question of whether money could be more usefully applied to tackle the crisis around the world rather than spend it on space research is a very controversial issue. There are, therefore, people on both sides of the argument who have feelings either for or against. Many people believe that money should be spent to solve food crisis in Africa and South Asia. Drought, for example, left Africa with famine. Every 30 seconds an African child dies of hunger and about 45% of children in South Asia suffer from malnutrition. Similarly, the global issue is the conflict of AIDS in Africa. Although, there are numerous factors in the spread of HIV/AIDS, it is largerly recognized as a disease of poverty. Medicines, for instance, are very expensive and the government in poor countries can not afford to treat the disease, therefore, millions are dying, while in rich countries people live longer.
However, there are people who oppose the former argument. They claim that space research has brought enormous benefits to mankind. NASA has launched Satellites for weather and climate, which give the scientists view of earth's atmosphere, helping them to improve their abilities to forecast weather and predict climate change.

From what has been discussed above we may draw the conclusion that both points of view have their advantages. Although, human life has priority in our societies, advanced research should be carried out to find another source of energy, water on other planets, and to understand the planets and its' effect on для важных дел

Результаты (английский) 1:

The question of whether the money could be more usefully applied to tackle the crisis around the world rather than spend it on space research is a very issue there. There are, therefore, people on both sides of the argument who have feelings either for or against. Many people believe that money should be spent to solve food crisis in Africa and South Asia. Drought, for example, left Africa with famine. Every 30 seconds an African child dies of hunger and about 45% of children in South Asia suffer from malnutrition. Similarly, the global issue is the conflict of AIDS in Africa. Although, there are numerous factors in the spread of HIV/AIDS, it is largerly recognized as a disease of poverty. Medicines, for instance, are very expensive and the government in poor countries can not the Roma community to treat the disease, therefore, millions are dying, while in rich countries people live longer. However, there are people who oppose the former argument. They claim that space research has brought enormous benefits to mankind. NASA has launched Satellites for weather and climate, which give the scientists view of earth's atmosphere, helping them to improve their abilities to forecast weather and predict climate change. From what has been discussed above we may draw the conclusion that both points of view have their advantages. Although, human life has priority in our societies, advanced research should be carried out to find another source of energy, water on other planets, and to understand the planets and its ' effect on for important cases

Результаты (английский) 2:

The question of whether money could be more usefully applied to tackle the crisis around the world rather than spend it on space research is a very controversial issue. There are, therefore, people on both sides of the argument who have feelings either for or against. Many people believe that money should be spent to solve food crisis in Africa and South Asia. Drought, for example, left Africa with famine. Every 30 seconds an African child dies of hunger and about 45% of children in South Asia suffer from malnutrition. Similarly, the global issue is the conflict of AIDS in Africa. Although, there are numerous factors in the spread of HIV / AIDS, it is largerly recognized as a disease of poverty. Medicines, for the instance, are very expensive and the Government in poor Countries CAN Afford not to treat basis the disease, therefore, are Millions Dying, 'while' in the live rich Countries longer a people.
HOWEVER, there are people the who oppose the former's the argument. They claim that space research has brought enormous benefits to mankind. NASA's has the launched Satellites for weather and climate, the which give the Scientists the view of earth's atmosphere Insider, Helping Them to Improve Their abilities to forecast weather and Predict climate the change.

The From what has Been Discussed the above we may The draw the Conclusion That Both points of the view have Their advantages. Although, human life has priority in our societies, advanced research should be carried out to find another source of energy, water on other planets, and to understand the planets and its' effect on important matters for the

Результаты (английский) 3:

the question of whether there could be more usefully applied to tackle the crisis around the world rather than spend it on space research is a very attentive, friendly issue. there are, therefore, people on both sides of the argument, and have feelings either for or against. many people believe that money should be spent to solve food crisis in africa and south asia. drought, for example, in africa, with three. every 30 seconds an african child dies of hunger and about 45% of children in south asia suffer from malnutrition. similarly, the global issue is the conflict of aids in africa. although, there are numerous factors in the spread of hiv / aids, it is largerly recognized as a disease of poverty. medicines, for instance, are very expensive and the government in poor countries can not afford to treat the disease, therefore, millions are dying, while in rich countries people live longer.however, there are people who oppose the former argument. they claim that space research has brought enormous benefits to mankind. nasa has launched satellites for weather and climate, which give the with view of earth"s atmosphere, helping them to improve their abilities to forecast weather and predict climate change.from what has been discussed above, we may draw the conclusion that both points of view have their advantages. although, human life has priority in our societies, advanced research should be carried out to find another source of energy, and on other planets, and to understand the planets and its" effect on important affairs