Результаты (
английский) 2:
[копия]Скопировано!
There are two variations of basic approach to the interpretation of the essence of the State:
1. Class approach (the interests of the ruling class) class approach reveals the essence of the state as an expression of the interests of the ruling class, which imposes its own will on the rest of the state population. The class is characteristic of the Marxist understanding of the state, treat the state as an instrument of oppression of the proletariat. 2. General social approach (the interests of society) general social approach reveals the essence of the state as an expression of the interests of all social strata. Based on the state's ability to act as an arbitrator of public relations, to create the possibility of a compromise between different social classes and groups. General social approach is characteristic of most modern democratic state of law. In addition, there are approaches to the treatment of the minor nature of the state: 1. National approach (the interests of the titular nation) national approach reveals the essence of the state as an expression of the interests of only one nation. Based on the provision of benefits and privileges of the titular nation. A national approach was typical of many empires. 2. Racial profiling (the interests of the same race) racial approach reveals the essence of the state as an expression of the interests of only one race. It based on the provision of benefits and privileges of the so-called master race and the gross neglect of the interests of other racial groups. Racial approach was characteristic of Nazi Germany. 3. Religious Approach (the interests of a particular religion) religious approach reveals the essence of the state as an expression of the interests of the most religious society in the framework of the one religion. Based on strict adherence to religious norms and dogmas. Religious approach is characteristic of modern Iran or Saudi Arabia.
переводится, пожалуйста, подождите..
