В некоторых странах смертная казнь

В некоторых странах смертная казнь считается мерой, без которой невозможно остановить распространение наркотиков, ликвидировать политический терроризм, экономическую коррупцию или искоренить супружескую неверность.
Оправдывая смертную казнь, чаще всего говорят, что она необходима, по крайней мере временно, для блага общества.
Однако имеет ли государство право лишать человека жизни?
Многовековой опыт применения высшей меры наказания и научные исследования о взаимосвязи смертной казни и уровня преступности не дали убедительных доказательств, что смертная казнь способна эффективно защитить общество от преступности или способствовать правосудию. Ни одна система уголовной юстиции не доказала свою способность последовательно и справедливо решать, кто должен жить и кто — умереть. Некоторым удается избежать смертной казни с помощью квалифицированных защитников; другим — потому что их судят мягкосердечные судьи или присяжные; третьим помогают их политические связи или положение в обществе. Однако существует определенный процент судебных ошибок, последствия которых особенно трагичны при приведении смертного приговора в исполнение.

Результаты (английский) 1:

In some countries, the death penalty is considered the measure, without which it is impossible to stop the spread of drugs, eradicate political terrorism, economic corruption or eliminate infidelity. Justifying the death penalty most often say that it is necessary, at least temporarily, for the benefit of society. However, whether the State has the right to deprive a person of life?Centuries of experience in the application of capital punishment and the research on the relationship between the death penalty and crime rates have not produced convincing evidence that the death penalty can effectively protect society from crime or to promote justice. None of the criminal justice system has not proved its ability to consistently and fairly decide who should live and who is to die. Some avoided the death penalty by using skilled defenders; the other is because they are judged by a judge or jury mjagkoserdechnye; third help their political ties or position in society. However, there is a certain percentage of judicial error, whose consequences are especially tragic when enforcement of the death sentence.

Результаты (английский) 2:

In some countries, the death penalty is considered a measure without which it is impossible to stop the spread of drugs, eliminate political terrorism, economic corruption or adultery eradicate.
Justifying the death penalty, most often say that it is necessary, at least temporarily, for the good of society.
However, whether the state the right to deprive a person of life?
Centuries of experience in the application of capital punishment, and research on the relationship of the death penalty and crime rates have not given convincing evidence that the death penalty is able to effectively protect society from crime and promote justice. None of the criminal justice system has not demonstrated its ability to consistently and fairly decide who should live and who - to die. Some manage to escape the death penalty by qualified defenders; others - because they are judged softhearted judge or a jury; third to help their political connections or position in society. However, there is a certain percentage of miscarriages of justice, the consequences of which are particularly tragic when carrying out the death sentence.

Результаты (английский) 3:

in some countries, the death penalty is considered to be a measure, without which it is impossible to stop the spread of drugs, to eliminate political terrorism, economic corruption and eradicate the adultery.for the death penalty, most say it is necessary, at least temporarily, for the good of society.however, whether the state has the right to deprive the life of a man?long experience in the application of capital punishment and the research on the relationship between the death penalty and crime levels gave convincing evidence that the death penalty can effectively protect society from crime or to promote justice. no system of criminal justice has proven to consistently and correctly to decide who will live and who will die. some are able to avoid the death penalty by qualified counsel; the other is because the judge мягкосердечные judge or jury; the third is the political context or position in society. however, there is a certain percentage of mistakes, the consequences of which particularly tragic in the execution is.