Давно известно также, что один ребе

Давно известно также, что один ребенок в семье вырастает эгоистом, что само по себе экономически невыгодно. Бытует расхожее заблуждение, что наличие нескольких детей в семье — это большие расходы. Но ведь не меньший, если не больший ущерб как в психологическом, так и в экономическом отношении родителям приносят дети-эгоисты, не имеющие братьев и сестер и думающие только о себе.

При этом можно легко опровергнуть миф об экономических причинах малодетности, проанализировав формы репродуктивного поведения среди представителей разных слоев населения.

Несложно проследить, что сейчас даже очень богатые люди имеют не более двух (!) детей. Почему? Вроде бы и условия позволяют, и деньги есть. Ответ очень прост: «так удобнее», «у всех сейчас так».

К слову, заметим, что многие родители, имеющие больше двух детей, говорят о парадоксальной закономерности: с каждым новым ребенком благосостояние семьи улучшается.

Этому можно найти и весьма простое объяснение: ответственные родители с каждым пополнением в семье сами начинают активно искать способы улучшения собственного материального благополучия, и у многих это получается. То есть дети в данном случае выступают неким стимулом для повышения материальной обеспеченности семьи.

Результаты (английский) 1:

It has long been known also that one child in the family grows selfish, which itself is economically unprofitable. There is a popular misconception that having multiple children in a family is a big expense. But equally, if not more damaging psychologically and economically parents bring children selfish not having brothers and sisters and think only of themselves.You can easily refute the myth on the economic causes of malodetnosti, having examined the forms of reproductive behaviour among representatives of different segments of the population.It is easy to see that now even the very rich people have no more than two (!) children. Why? Like and conditions allow, and the money is there. The answer is very simple: "easier", "all right now".By the way, note that many parents with more than two children, talking about paradoxical patterns: with each new baby family welfare improving.This can be found and a very simple explanation: responsible parents with each replenishment in the family themselves are beginning to actively seek out ways to improve their own well-being, and for many it is. Then there are kids in this case serve a kind of incentive to improve the material well-being of families.

Результаты (английский) 2:

It has long been well known that a child grows up in a family of selfish, that in itself is economically unprofitable. There is a common misconception that there are several children in the family - a great expense. But no less, if not more damage both psychologically and economically parents bring children egoists who do not have brothers and sisters, and think only of themselves.

This can easily refute the myth of economic reasons few children, analyzing the form of reproductive behavior among the different segments of the population.

It is easy to follow, that now even the very rich are not more than two (!) Children. Why? It seems to be the conditions allow, and the money is there. The answer is very simple: "so comfortable", "everyone is now so".

By the way, note that many parents who have more than two children, talk about the paradoxical pattern: with each new child of the family welfare improves.

It is possible to find a very simple explanation: responsible parents with each new addition to the family themselves are starting to actively look for ways to improve their own material well-being, and many succeed. That is, the children in this case are the kind of incentive to improve family financial security.

Результаты (английский) 3:

while it is also known that a child grow up selfish, which in itself isn't economically viable. there is a popular misconception that several children in the family is a large expenditure. but it is no less, if not more damage to both psychologically and economically, so parents have children are selfish, do not have brothers and sisters and who only about themselves.it can be easy to disprove the myth of economic causes малодетности by analysing the form of reproductive behaviour among different segments of the population.easy to see that even the very rich people have no more than two (!) children. why? like if conditions allow, and money is. the answer is very simple: "so удобнее»," all right now ".by the way, note that many parents with more than two children, talk about the paradoxical patterns: with each new child family well-being is improving.this can be a very simple explanation: responsible parents each replenishment in the family who are actively looking for ways to improve their own well-being, and lots of it. so children in this case have an incentive to increase family income.