надо говорить конкретно, что означа

надо говорить конкретно, что означает «обижать». Например, «нельзя бить девочек, если они не бьют тебя», и смысл глагола «обижать» конкретизируется, а не переносится на всю гипотетическую совокупность действий. Или «нельзя намеренно указывать на недостатки, которые человек не может исправить». Это уже для детей постарше, да. И, кстати, заметили, что эти правила не только к девочкам относятся? Значит они правильные.
И тогда парень вырастет с нормальной адекватной реакцией на явные манипуляции через чувство вины: «Хочешь страдать — это твой выбор. Тебя что-то не устраивает — давай обсудим». Хотя бы появится презумпция невиновности в разборках, а не так, что ты виноват только потому, что у нее глаза на мокром месте.
Ну и чисто для симметрии. Когда-нибудь вы слышали, чтобы родители строго так говорили девочке: «нельзя обижать мальчиков»? Вряд ли. Значит можно! Нормальное общество?

Результаты (английский) 1:

to say specifically that means "offend". For example, "you can't beat girls, if they don't beat you," and the meaning of the verb "hurt" specified, instead of the entire hypothetical set of actions. Or "you can't deliberately point to the shortcomings that the person cannot fix. It is already for older children, Yes. And, by the way, notice that these rules not only are girls? Mean they are correct.And then the guy grow from normal adequate reaction to explicit manipulation through guilt: "If you want to suffer-it's your choice. Something you are not comfortable with — let's discuss. " At least the presumption of innocence appears at disassembly, but not so that you are guilty just because she has eyes on a wet spot.Oh and purely for symmetry. Ever you heard parents strictly so talked to the girl: "you can't offend boys"? Unlikely. It means you can! Normal society?

Результаты (английский) 2:

It should be specific, which means "to offend". For example, "you can not beat the girls, if they do not beat you," and the meaning of "offending" the verb is specified, but does not extend to all the hypothetical set of actions. Or "can not deliberately point out flaws that a person can not fix." This is for older children, yes. And by the way, we notice that these rules do not only apply to girls? So they are right.
And then the guy will grow from normal adequate response to explicit manipulation by guilt: "Do you want to suffer - it's your choice. You is not satisfied - let's talk. " At least it will be a presumption of innocence in the disassembly, not so that you are guilty just because she has her eyes on a wet place.
Well, purely for symmetry. Someday you heard that parents strictly because the girl said: "Boys should not hurt"? Hardly. So you can! Normal society?

Результаты (английский) 3:

to speak specifically, which means "обижать». for example, "you can"t beat the girls, if they don"t hit you," and the meaning of the verb "обижать» is applied, and cannot be extended to all possible combination of actions. or "you can"t intentionally indicate deficiencies that man could not repair. this is for the children of older, yes. and by the way, notice that these rules are not only to girls? so they"re right.and then the guy will grow with a proper reaction to the apparent manipulation through guilt: "you want to - it"s your choice. you don"t like something, let"s обсудим». at least a presumption of innocence in the drama, but not so that you are to blame because her eyes wet.so, just for the symmetry. ever you heard that parents strictly said the girl: "you can"t hurt the boy"? i don"t think so. so can i! the normal society?