В случае, если одно из государств с

В случае, если одно из государств сделает ставку на ограниченную или полную самообеспеченность, а другое - нет, то конфликт между ними неизбежен. Наибольшие шансы на развитие в изоляции имеет более обеспеченная ресурсами Россия. В этом случае максимально возможная интеграция России и Украины все-таки возможна - Украина может получать дополнительные дивиденды от привилегированного положения посредника между Россией и Европой. И эта роль может быть как политически нейтральна, так и антироссийской.

Результаты (английский) 1:

If a State chooses to bet on a limited or full self-sufficiency, and the other is not, the conflict between them is unavoidable. Most likely to develop in isolation is more resourced Russia. In this case, the maximum possible integration of Russia and Ukraine still possible-Ukraine may receive extra dividends from the privileged position of intermediary between Russia and Europe. And this role can be as politically neutral and anti-Russian.

Результаты (английский) 2:

If one of the states will count on limited or full self-sufficiency, and the other - no, the conflict between them is inevitable. The greatest chance of developing in isolation is more resourced Russia. In this case, the maximum possible integration between Russia and Ukraine is still possible - Ukraine may receive additional dividends from the privileged position of mediator between Russia and Europe. And this role can be as politically neutral and anti-Russian.

Результаты (английский) 3:

In case, if one of the states would rely on a limited or full self-sufficiency, and the other is not, the conflict between them is inevitable.The greatest chances for development in isolation is more resourced Russia.In this case, the maximum possible integration of Russia and Ukraine still possible - Ukraine may receive additional dividends from privileged position as an intermediary between Russia and Europe.And this role may be as a politically neutral and glaring inconsistencies.