Но в чертеже имеет существование и

Но в чертеже имеет существование и весомость — черта, отсутствующая в здании, и наоборот, весомость стен здания отсутствует в чертеже, кажется в нем пустотой; бытие чертежа приходится на небытие здания, и наоборот.

Результаты (английский) 1:

But in the drawing is the existence and importance — a trait missing in the building and on the contrary, the weight of the walls of the building does not exist in the drawing, it seems it emptiness; Genesis drawing falls on the nothingness of the building, and vice versa.

Результаты (английский) 2:

But the drawing is the existence and weight - a feature absent in the building and on the contrary, the weight of the walls of the building is not in the drawing, it seems void; It is a drawing account for non-existence of the building and vice versa.

Результаты (английский) 3:

but in the figure is the existence and the value - are not contained in the building, and on the contrary, the weight of the building is not in the plan, i think it is a must to have the building plans; and vice versa.