Автор данной статьи не высказывает

Автор данной статьи не высказывает на прямую свое личное мнение, а передает его по средствам цитат лидеров государств, т.е. держится несколько отстранённо, излагая информацию в европейском стиле.
В данной статье говориться о том, что Барак Обама угрожает санкциями, которые на практике реализуются ЕС. Отсюда можно прийти к выводу, о доминировании США над ЕС. Введение санкций, по заявлению Председателя Совета Европы, это ответ на бездействии Российской Федерации по отношению урегулирования ситуации на территории Украины. Таким образом, санкции были введены независимо от того, что встреча в Белоруссии привела к подписанию соглашения о прекращении огня и отводе войск. Вышеизложенное говорит о том, что санкции не имеют ни малейшего отношения к внешней политике России, а лишь являются частью экономической войны против неё.
Так же в статье автор освещает, косвенно, долговой кризис в Греции, ядерную программу в Иране и угрозу Исламского Государства.
Вследствие того, что вопрос о поставке вооружения на территорию Украины остается на повестке дня, мобилизация имеет место как на территории Украины, так и на территории ДНР, а так же военные действия в данном районе крайне выгодны ряду лиц, то можно предположить , что подписание Минского соглашения не приведет к полнейшему прекращению огня и будет неоднократно нарушаться.

Результаты (английский) 1:

The author of this article has not expressed his personal opinion directly, but passes it by means of quotes leaders, i.e. kept few; in information in European style.This article tells us that Barack Obama threatens sanctions, which in practice are implemented by the EU. From here you can come to a conclusion about the dominance of United States over EU. The imposition of sanctions, according to the Chairman of the Council of Europe, it is a response to the omission of the Russian Federation with respect to resolving the situation in the territory of Ukraine. Thus, the sanctions were imposed, regardless of that meeting in Belarus has led to the signing of an agreement on a ceasefire and withdrawal of troops. The foregoing suggests that sanctions do not have the slightest relation to Russian foreign policy, but merely are part of economic warfare against it.Also in the article, the author illuminates, indirectly, the debt crisis in Greece, the nuclear programme in Iran and the threat of an Islamic State.Due to the fact that the question of supplying weapons to the territory of Ukraine remains on the agenda, the mobilization takes place both in Ukraine and in the territory of the DNI, as well as military activity in this area is extremely beneficial to a number of persons, it can be assumed that the signing of the Minsk agreement will not lead to a full cease-fire and will repeatedly violated.

Результаты (английский) 2:

Author of this article does not express a direct personal opinion, and transmits it to the leaders of the media citations, ie keeps some detached, posing the information in the European style.
This article talk about that Barack Obama threatens sanctions that are implemented in practice the EU. From this we can conclude about the dominance of the United States of the EU. The imposition of sanctions, according to the Chairman of the Council of Europe, the answer to the inaction of the Russian Federation in relation to the settlement of the situation in Ukraine. Thus, the sanctions were imposed, regardless of the fact that the meeting in Belarus led to the signing of the ceasefire and withdrawal of troops. The foregoing suggests that the sanctions do not have any relation to the foreign policy of Russia, and only form part of the economic war against it.
Also in the article, the author highlights, indirectly, the debt crisis in Greece, nuclear programs in Iran and the threat of an Islamic state.
As a result that the question of arms supplies to Ukraine remains on the agenda, the mobilization takes place on the territory of Ukraine and on the territory of the NPT, as well as military operations in the region are extremely favorable number of individuals, it can be assumed that the signing of the Minsk Agreement does not lead to a complete cease-fire and will repeatedly violated.

Результаты (английский) 3:

The author this article is not expressed in the direct their personal views, and transmits it to the quotations from leaders of states, i.e. , stay a few impassive, offering information on a European style.
In this article read that Barak Obama threatens sanctions, which in practice are implemented the EU. From here, you can come to the conclusion, the dominance of the EU. The imposition of sanctions,On the statement of the Chairman of the Council of Europe, it is an answer to the omissions in the Russian Federation with a settlement of the situation in the territory of Ukraine. Thus, the sanctions have been imposed regardless ofThat the meeting in Belarus has led to the signing of the agreement on a cease-fire and the withdrawal of troops. The above said that the sanctions have no bearing on the foreign policy of Russia,Only a part of the economic war against it.
in the same article the author highlights, indirectly, the debt crisis in Greece, the nuclear program in Iran and the threat of the Islamic State.
due to addition,That the question of the delivery weapons on the territory of Ukraine remains on the agenda, as well as resource mobilization has a place in the territory of Ukraine, and on the territory of the MDN,As well as military actions in this area is extremely beneficial a number of individuals, it can be assumed, that signing the Minsk agreement does not lead to the fullest a cease-fire and will be repeatedly violated.