Ведущие державы региона, по мнению

Ведущие державы региона, по мнению большинства экспертов, поддерживая официально мирное объединение Кореи, не заинтересованы на деле в его практическом осуществлении. Для США неизбежно встанет вопрос о военном присутствии на полуострове. Учитывая возможность противостояния с Китаем в ближайшие десятилетия, такое присутствие имеет для США значительную стратегическую ценность. В Японии перспектива появления мощного единого корейского государства вызывает озабоченность, особенно учитывая историческое прошлое. В Китае вряд ли вызывает энтузиазм потеря КНДР как идеологически близкого союзника. Кроме того, пока существует корейская проблема, Соединенные Штаты вынуждены отвлекать силы и ресурсы на поддержание статус-кво на Корейском полуострове, что, естественно, отвечает китайским интересам. Для России объединение Кореи лишает смысла сбалансированный подход к двум корейским государствам, который рассматривается как средство укрепления влияния в регионе. Неясно, какие иные инструменты влияния останутся в этом случае у России, учитывая тяжелую нынешнюю обстановку на Дальнем Востоке и неутешительные перспективы ее улучшения. Рано или поздно могут возникнуть разительные дисбалансы в уровнях развития объединенной Кореи и соседних российских регионов. Необходимость вложения очень крупных средств в подъем экономики Севера окончательно перекроет и без того небольшой поток южнокорейских (а, возможно, и японских) инвестиций в освоение российских дальневосточных ресурсов.

Результаты (английский) 1:

The major powers in the region, according to most experts, supporting the peaceful unification of Korea, officially not interested actually in its practical implementation. For the United States will inevitably raise the issue of military presence on the peninsula. Bearing in mind the possibility of confrontation with China in the coming decades, such a presence is for United States a significant strategic value. In Japan, the prospect of a powerful unified Korean State concern, especially in view of the historical past. In China hardly causes a loss of enthusiasm for the DPRK as ideologically close ally. In addition, there is the problem of Korea, the United States must divert energy and resources on maintaining the status quo on the Korean peninsula, which, of course, meets Chinese interests. For Russia, the unification of Korea undermines a balanced approach between the two Korean States, which is seen as a means to increase his influence in the region. It is unclear what other instruments of influence will remain in this case Russia, given the heavy current situation in the far East and the disappointing prospects improve. Sooner or later you may encounter profound imbalances in the levels of development of the joint Korea and neighboring Russian regions. The need for very large investments of funds in the economy of the North finally overrides the already small stream South Korean (and possibly Japanese) Russian Far Eastern investment resources.

Результаты (английский) 2:

The major powers in the region, according to most experts, is officially supporting the peaceful unification of Korea, in fact, not interested in its practical implementation. For the US, will inevitably raise the question of the military presence on the peninsula. Given the possibility of confrontation with China over the next decade, such a presence is significant for the US strategic value. In Japan, the prospect of a powerful unified Korean state concern, especially given the historical past. China is unlikely to cause the loss of enthusiasm DPRK ideologically close ally. In addition, there is the Korean issue, the United States forced to divert energy and resources on maintaining the status quo on the Korean peninsula, which is naturally suited to China's interests. For Russia, the unification of Korea makes little sense for a balanced approach to the two Koreas, which is seen as a means of strengthening influence in the region. It is not clear what other tools of influence will in this case Russia, given the heavy current situation in the Far East and the disappointing prospects for improvement. Sooner or later, may be striking imbalances in the levels of development of unified Korea and neighboring Russian regions. The need to invest very heavily in the economic recovery of the North completely block the already small stream Korean (and, perhaps, and Japanese) investment in the development of the Russian Far East resources.

Результаты (английский) 3:

The major Powers in the region, according to most experts, supporting officially the peaceful unification of Korea, are not interested in its practical implementation.For the United States would inevitably bring into question the military presence on the peninsula. Bearing in mind the possibility confrontation with China in the coming decades, such a presence is for us a significant strategic value.In Japan the prospect of a powerful unified Korean state is a matter of concern, particularly given the historical past.In China is unlikely to cause loss of enthusiasm the DPRK as ideologically close ally. In addition, as long as there is a democratic problem,The United States to divert forces and resources to the maintenance of the status quo on the Korean peninsula, which, of course, is in China's interests.For Russia the unification of Korea meaningless a balanced approach to the two Korean states, which is seen as a means of influence in the region. It is not clear,What other tools influence will remain in this case, the Russian Federation, taking into account the heavy the current situation in the Far East and dismal prospects for its improvement.Sooner or later there may be striking imbalances in the levels of development of the Korean Peninsula and the neighboring Russian regions.The need to invest very large funds in the economy of the North finally stopping and without the small stream south Korean (and, possibly,And Japanese) investment in the Russian far east resources.