NanotechnologySo is the public afra

Nanotechnology
So is the public afraid of nanotechnology? No, they are not. The 1) ............... findings
that we have show that the public is still fairly neutral about nanotechnology, in part because
little is known about it. So that’s where the public stands at the moment. I did work that looked
at public willingness to use a new commercial product containing nanotechnology, and in fact I
studied four different commercial products. One was a drug product, another was skin lotion,
the third was automobile 2) ............... containing nanotechnology, and a fourth was a
refrigerator gas 3) ............... containing nanotechnology, all of which were claimed to have
both risks and benefits.
I just want to talk briefly about some results that we found from the Centre for
Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University. The current project scores how public
perceptions match up, or don’t match up actually, with scientific 4) ............... on
nanotechnology. One of the most interesting findings is that nanotechnology may be one of the
first emerging technologies where scientists are more concerned about some of the risks than
the public, particularly in the areas of environment and human health. Another interesting
finding is that, not surprisingly, scientists thought that nanotechnology was more useful for
society and more morally acceptable than the public, but the need for regulation is pretty
similar across the scientists and public. Their sense for the need for regulation in the
nanotechnology area was quite similar, with only 22% of the public and 13% of scientists
thinking that it was more important to advance nanotechnology quickly than to protect the
public from unknown 5) ..............., so pretty low numbers there. Then the last finding that I just
want to emphasise is we asked scientists who had the highest level of expertise to communicate
with the public about potential risks and 6) ............... of nanotechnology. And their response
was they overwhelmingly supported university scientists. When we asked the public who they
trusted most to actually communicate with them about the risks and benefits of
nanotechnology, they trusted the university scientists the most. So we actually think this a
policy-relevant finding, that university scientists don’t often 7) ............... in this sort of dialogue
with the public but they do seem to have high levels of trust from the public as well as high
levels of expertise according to their 8) ............... .

Результаты (английский) 1:

NanotechnologySo is the public afraid of nanotechnology? No, they are not. The 1)............... findingsthat we have show that the public is still fairly neutral about nanotechnology, in part becauselittle is known about it. So that's where the public stands at the moment. I did work that lookedat public willingness to use a new commercial product containing nanotechnology, and in fact Istudied four different commercial products. One was a drug product, another was skin lotion,the third was automobile 2) ... ... ... ... ... containing nanotechnology, and a fourth was adubbed Zim Zum gas 3)............... containing nanotechnology, all of which were claimed to haveboth risks and benefits.I just want to talk briefly about some results that we found from the Centre forNanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University. The current project scores how publicperceptions match up, or don't match up actually, with scientific 4) ... ... ... ... ... onnanotechnology. One of the most interesting findings is that nanotechnology may be one of thefirst emerging technologies where scientists are more concerned about some of the risks thanthe public, particularly in the areas of environment and human health. Another interestingfinding is that, not surprisingly, scientists thought that nanotechnology was more useful forsociety and more morally acceptable than the public, but the need for regulation is prettysimilar across the scientists and the public. Their sense for the need for regulation in theNanotechnology area was quite similar, with only 22% of the public and 13% of scientiststhinking that it was more important to advance nanotechnology quickly than to protect thepublic from unknown 5)..............., so pretty low numbers there. Then the last finding that I justwant to emphasise is we asked scientists who had the highest level of expertise to communicatewith the public about potential risks and 6) ... ... ... ... ... of nanotechnology. And their responsewas they overwhelmingly supported university scientists. When we asked the public who theytrusted most to actually communicate with them about the risks and benefits ofNanotechnology, they trusted the university scientists the most. So we actually think this apolicy-relevant finding, that university scientists don't often 7) ... ... ... ... ... in this sort of dialoguewith the public but they do seem to have high levels of trust from the public as well as highlevels of expertise according to their 8)................

Результаты (английский) 2:

Nanotechnology
So the public is afraid of nanotechnology? No, they are not. The 1) ............... findings
that we have show that the public is still fairly neutral about nanotechnology, in part because
little is known about it. So that's where the public stands at the moment. I did work that I looked
at public willingness to use a new commercial product containing nanotechnology, and in fact I
studied four different commercial products. Was a drug One product, skin lotion was another,
the third was automobile 2) ............... containing nanotechnology, and a fourth was a
refrigerator 3 gas) ...... containing nanotechnology ........., all of which were claimed to have
both risks and benefits.
I just want to talk briefly about some results that we found from the Centre for
Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona You State University. Current project scores The how public
perceptions match up, or do not actually match up, with scientific 4) ............... on
nanotechnology. Most of the One interesting findings is that nanotechnology may be one of the
first emerging technologies where scientists are more concerned about some of the risks than
the public, particularly in the areas of environment and human health. Interesting Another
finding is that, not surprisingly, scientists thought that nanotechnology was more useful for
society and more morally acceptable than the public, but the need for regulation is pretty
similar across the public and scientists. For the sense Their need for regulation in the
nanotechnology area was quite similar, with only 22% of the public and scientists of 13%
thinking that it was more important to advance nanotechnology quickly than to protect the
public from unknown 5) .... ..........., so pretty low numbers there. The last finding Then that I just
want to emphasise is we asked scientists who had the highest level of expertise to communicate
with the public about potential risks and 6) ............... of nanotechnology. Their response And
was they overwhelmingly supported university scientists. We asked the When public who they
trusted most to actually communicate with them about the risks and benefits of
nanotechnology, they trusted the university scientists the most. We actually think So this a
policy-relevant finding, that university scientists do not often 7) ............... in this sort of dialogue
with the public but they do seem to have high of trust from levels the public as well as high
levels of expertise according to their 8) ................

Результаты (английский) 3:

Nanotechnology
i is the public afraid of nanotechnology? no, they are not. the 1)............... findings - that we have show that the public is still fairly neutral about nanotechnology, in part because
little is known about it. so that's where the public stands at the moment. i did work that was speaking at public willingness to use a new commercial product containing nanotechnology, and in fact i
set four different commercial products. one was a drug product, it was, lotion
2) is the third full............... containing nanotechnology, and a fourth was a
3)............... gas refrigerator containing nanotechnology, all of which were claimed to have
both risks and benefits. "i just want to talk briefly about some results that we found from the centre for.Nanotechnology in society at arizona state university. the current project scores how public
according match up, or don't match up with scientific............... (, 4) on
nanotechnology. one of the most interesting findings is that nanotechnology may be one of the
for emerging technologies where with are more concerned about some of the risks than
the public.particularly in the areas of environment and human health. another interesting
finding is that, not surprisingly, with thought that nanotechnology was more useful for
society and more morally thing than the public, but the need for regulation is pretty
similar across the with and public. their sense of the need for regulation in the
nanotechnology area is more similar.with only 22% of the public and 13 per cent of with
thinking that it was more important to advance nanotechnology quickly than to protect the public from unknown
5)..............., so pretty low numbers. then the last finding that i just want to emphasise
is there was not with who had the highest level of expertise to communicate
with the public about potential risks and 6)...............of nanotechnology. and their response
was they overwhelmingly supported university with. we got the public who are trusted to make a
of with them about the risks and benefits of nanotechnology ", leading the university with the most. so we actually think this a
policy - relevant finding, that university with don 't (7)...............in this sort of dialogue
with the public, but they do seem to have high levels of trust from the public as well as high levels of expertise. according to their............... 8) .