Есть три различных типа государств

Есть три различных типа государств в глобальной структуре энергетики: производители энергетических ресурсов, транзитные государства и страны-потребители. В общем, рациональность в энергетических потребителях и транзитных государствах понимается как "просто наличие достаточных поставок по доступным ценам» (18). Производители энергии «стремятся к безопасности спроса - гарантии того, что их продукция будет закуплена по справедливой цене в течение длительного времени, так что национальные бюджеты могут ожидать устойчивый и предсказуемый поток доходов» (19). Однако, рациональность государства, в международной системе, не обязательно связана с экономической рациональностью. Долгосрочные цели в международной системе, возможно, не обязательно совпадают с экономической целью повышения финансовой выгоды. Очевидные краткосрочные экономические выгоды могут быть принесены в жертву усилению политической власти государства, при этом используя энергоресурсы как политический инструмент. Например, некоторые государства продают энергоресурсы для некоторых государств по цене ниже рыночной, так как они стремятся к укреплению внешней и внутренней политики и национальной безопасности. В пример можно привести предложение Уго Чавеса нефти и нефтяных доходов в другие государства Латинской Америки в 2005 году, чтобы получить влияние и поддержку (The Economist 2005). Другой недавний пример из 2010-х годов использования энергоресурсов в качестве политического инструмента, являются газовые споры между Россией и Украиной по поводу поставок природного газа, цены и долга. (Ссылка) Это не означает, что они действуют иррационально, хотя действия экономически нерациональны, но государственная власть подразумевает не только экономические показатели.

Результаты (английский) 1:

There are three different types of States in the global energy mix: producers of energy resources, transit States and consumers. In General, energy consumers and rationality in the transition States is understood as "simply the existence of sufficient supply at affordable prices" (18). Energy producers strive to demand security guarantees that their products will be purchased at a fair price for a long time, so that the national budgets can expect steady and predictable stream of income "(19). However, the rationality of the State in the international system, not necessarily linked to economic rationality. The long-term objectives in the international system might not necessarily coincide with the economic purpose of increasing financial benefits. The obvious short-term economic benefits might be sacrificed to strengthen the political power of the State, while still using energy resources as a political tool. For example, some States sell energy for certain States at a price below the market as they seek to strengthen foreign and domestic policy and national security. As an example we can cite the proposal Chavez oil and oil revenues in the other Latin American States in 2005 year to get influence and support (The Economist 2005). Another recent example of 2010-ies of the use of energy as a political tool, are gas disputes between Russia and Ukraine over natural gas supplies, prices and debt. (Link) this does not mean that they are acting irrationally, although economically wasteful, but State power involves not only economic indicators.

Результаты (английский) 2:

There are three different types of states in the global energy mix: energy producers, transit countries and consumer countries. In general, the rationality of energy consumers and transit countries is understood as "just the availability of sufficient supply at affordable prices" (18). Manufacturers of energy "seek security of demand - ensure that their products will be bought at a fair price for a long time, so that national budgets can expect a steady and predictable stream of income "(19). However, the rationality of the state in the international system, not necessarily linked to economic rationality. Long-term goals in the international system may not necessarily coincide with the economic purpose of improving the financial benefits. Obvious short-term economic benefits may be sacrificed to strengthen the political power of the state, thus using energy as a political tool. For example, some states are selling energy resources for some States at below market price, as they seek to strengthen the domestic and foreign policy and national security. One example is the proposal of Hugo Chavez of oil and oil revenues in other Latin American countries in 2005 in order to gain influence and support (The Economist 2005). Another recent example of the 2010s the use of energy as a political tool is the gas dispute between Russia and Ukraine over natural gas supplies, prices and debt. (Link) This does not mean that they are acting irrationally, but the action is economically irrational, but the government involves not only economic indicators.

Результаты (английский) 3:

There are three different types of states in the global energy sector: manufacturers energy resources, transit States and consumer countries. In general,Rationality in the energy consumers and transit states is understood to be "simply the availability of sufficient supplies at affordable prices" (18).Energy Producers "seek to security of demand - guarantees that their products will be purchased at a fair price for a long period of time,So that national budgets can expect steady and predictable income stream" (19). However, rationality would state, in the international system, is not necessarily linked to the economic market conjuncture.Long-term objectives in the international system, it may not necessarily coincide with the economic order to improve financial benefits.Obvious short-term economic benefits can be sacrificed in the political power of the state, with the using energy as a political tool. For example,Some states sell energy for some states at below market price, as they seek to strengthen internal and external policy and the national security council.For example you can result in the proposal, Hugo Chavez's oil and oil revenues in other states in Latin America in the year 2005, to gain influence and support (The Economist 2005).Another recent example of the 2010-s use of energy as a political tool, are gas dispute between Russia and Ukraine on the supply of natural gas, prices and debt.(Link) This does not mean that they are irrational, while the actions economically нерациональны, but the power of the state is not only economic indicators.