Следовало бы предусмотреть в соглаш

Следовало бы предусмотреть в соглашениях Казахстана меры ответственности (например, имущественной) за бездействие одной из сторон, приведшее к ущербу на территории другой стороны. Все это позволяет сделать вывод о наличии самостоятельных объектов правового регулирования международных водных отношений, как отношений между государствами, часто с участием международных организаций, юридических и физических лиц по поводу совместных усилий в решении общих задач охраны и использования трансграничных водных объектов и трансграничных водных ресурсов. В связи с развитием международных водных отношений требуется пересмотр традиционных водных отношений, основой которых являлось понятие "трансграничный водный объект", а не трансграничный водный ресурс, заключенный в трансграничных водных объектах, используемый для различных целей и являющийся материальной ценностью. Учитывая, что основой разграничения публичных и частных отношений является категория "интерес", необходимо рассмотреть объекты водных отношений с позиции категорий "публичный и частный интерес".
Международное водное правоотношение способно иметь несколько объектов правовой деятельности и несколько объектов интереса. У международного водного правоотношения существуют юридически значимые объекты правовой деятельности - это водные объекты и их водные ресурсы, т.е. вода, их наполняемая. При этом каждое находится во взаимосвязи и дифференциации и имеет самостоятельное юридическое значение. Отношения, связанные с эксплуатацией трансграничных водных ресурсов (забором и сбросом воды) путем создания различного рода гидротехнических сооружений, с помощью которых водные ресурсы, находящиеся в водном объекте, из объекта природы становятся объектом хозяйствования, т.е. экономической ценностью, охватываются частноправовым понятием "международное водопользование". Это означает, что отношения международного водопользования из трансграничных водных объектов должны регулироваться международным частным правом.

Результаты (английский) 1:

Consideration should be given to the agreements of Kazakhstan penalties (e.g., property) omission of one of the parties, leading to damage in the territory of the other party. All this suggests that the availability of stand-alone objects of legal regulation of international water relations as relations between States, often with the participation of international organizations, businesses and individuals about joint efforts in addressing common challenges for the protection and use of transboundary water bodies and transboundary water resources. In connection with the development of international water relations requires a revision of the traditional water relations, the Foundation of which was the concept of "transboundary water body" rather than transboundary water resource, enclosed in transboundary water bodies used for various purposes and is of material value. Given that the basis of the distinction of public and private relations is "interest" category, it is necessary to consider objects of water relations from a position of "public and private interest". International water relationship can have several objects of legal activity and several objects of interest. The international water relationships exist legally meaningful objects of legal activity-this is water and their water resources, i.e. water, their napolnâemaâ. Each is interrelated and differentiation and is an independent legal significance. The relations connected with the exploitation of transboundary water resources (abstraction and discharge water) through the establishment of various types of hydraulic structures, through which the water resources in the water facility from an object of nature are subject to management, i.e., economic value, are covered by the civil concept of "international use". This means that the relations of the international water management of transboundary waters should be governed by international private law.

Результаты (английский) 2:

It should be stipulated in the agreement between Kazakhstan and accountability measures (such as property) omission of one of the parties, which led to damage in the territory of the other party. All this suggests the presence of independent objects of international legal regulation of water relations as relations between states, often with the participation of international organizations, legal entities and individuals about the joint efforts to address common problems of protection and use of transboundary waters and transboundary water resources. In connection with the development of international water relations require the revision of traditional water relations, which is based on the concept of "transboundary water body" instead of transboundary water resources, concluded in transboundary water bodies used for different purposes and is a material value. Given that the basis of differentiation of public and private relationship is the category of "interest", it is necessary to consider the objects of water relations from the perspective of the categories' public and private interests.
"International Water pravootnoshenie able to have multiple objects of legal activity and several objects of interest. In international water relationship exist legally significant objects of legal activity - this water bodies and water resources, ie water fills them. Moreover, each is in the relationship and differentiation and is an independent legal significance. Relations associated with the operation of transboundary water resources (intake and discharge) by creating various types of hydraulic structures through which water resources are in the water body, the nature of the object becomes the subject of management, ie economic value, are covered by private-law concept of "international water use." This means that the relationship of the international water management of transboundary waters shall be governed by private international law.

Результаты (английский) 3:

should be in the agreements of responsibility (e.g. property) for the failure of one of the parties, leading to damage in the territory of the other party.all this suggests a distinct objects of legal regulation of international water relations as relations between states, often with the participation of international organizations,entities and individuals about the joint efforts in addressing common challenges, the protection and use of transboundary waters and transboundary water resources.in connection with the development of international water relations requires a revision of the traditional water relations, the basis of which was the notion of "transboundary water body" and not a transboundary water resourcethe transboundary water bodies used for various purposes and as a material value. given that the distinction between public and private sphere is a category of "interest"it is necessary to consider the objects of water relations from the perspective of "public and private interest".the international water legal relationship can have several objects of legal activities, and few objects of interest.the international water legal relationship, there are legally relevant objects of judicial activities, is water and water resources). water, наполняемая.when each is in the relationship and differentiation and has an independent legal significance. relationshiprelating to the management of transboundary water resources, the fence and the discharge of water through the establishment of various types of hydraulic structures, through which the water in the water facilityfrom the object of nature become the object of management, i.e. economic value, are covered by the частноправовым concept "international management". this meansthe relationship of international water management of transboundary water bodies should be regulated by private international law.