Как показано в таблице 2, анализ вз

Как показано в таблице 2, анализ взаимовлияния заключался в том, что участникам «фокус- группы» необходимо было каждому НРИД присвоить значение от «0» до «3» в зависимости от степени влияния данного показателя друг на друга, где «0» означает, что нет влияния, «1» - слабое влияние, «2» - сильное влияние, «3» - экспоненциальное влияние. При оценке влияния каждого НРИД из группы управленческого внимания, необходимо было следовать следующей последовательности:

Результаты (английский) 1:

As shown in table 2, the analysis of the interaction was that participants of "focus groups", it was necessary to assign a value to each NRID from "0" to "3" depending on the degree of influence of each other, where "0" means that there is no impact, "1"-low impact, "2"-3 "strong influence"-the exponential effect. In assessing the impact of each management group of NRID attention, it was necessary to follow the following sequence:

Результаты (английский) 2:

As shown in Table 2, interference analysis was the fact that the participants of the "focus group" was necessary to assign a value to each NRID from "0" to "3" depending on the degree of influence of this indicator at each other, where "0" means that there is no effect, "1" - a weak effect, "2" - a strong influence, "3" - an exponential impact. In assessing the impact of each of the group NRID management attention, it was necessary to follow the following sequence:

Результаты (английский) 3:

as shown in table 2, the analysis of the place was that the "focus groups" to each нрид gain value from "0" to "3", depending on the degree of influence of each other, where 0 means that no influence, "1" point of impact "," 2 "," 3 "is a strong impact. - exponential effect. in assessing the impact of each нрид of managerial attention, should follow the following order: