Однако приведённый выше аргумент не

Однако приведённый выше аргумент не учитывает реакции сотрудников на введение новой системы планирования, т.е. основывается на неявном допущении, что такой реакции не последует. Между тем литература по контролю (напр., Merchant and Van der Stede 2007) убедительно показывает, что в случаях, когда система планирования используется в качестве основы для экономического стимулирования, реакцией сотрудников, принимающих участие в составлении планов, пренебрегать нельзя

Результаты (английский) 1:

However, the above argument does not take into account the reactions of the staff on the introduction of a new system of planning, i.e. based on the implicit assumption that this reaction does not follow. Meanwhile, the literature on verification (e.g., Merchant and Van der Stede 2007) clearly shows that in cases where the planning system is used as the basis for economic incentives, the reaction of the employees participating in the plans cannot be neglected

Результаты (английский) 2:

However, the argument The above does not include employees of the reaction to the introduction of the new planning system, ie, It is based on an implicit assumption that this reaction is not followed. Meanwhile, the literature on control (eg., Merchant and Van der Stede 2007) clearly shows that when the planning system is used as a basis for economic stimulation, the reaction of employees participating in the drafting of plans, can not be neglected

Результаты (английский) 3:

however, the above argument does not take into account the reaction of staff to the introduction of new planning system, i.e. based on the неявном approval that this reaction does not follow. however, the literature on control (e.g., merchant and van der Stede 2007) shows that when the planning system is used as the basis for economic stimulus response personnel involved in the planning, should not be neglected